The city's population is expected to mushroom to 9.1 million by 2030. Here's a novel way to accommodate that growth.

By 2030, New York City is projected to be home to 9.1 million inhabitants. Given the rigidities of the city’s natural and built topographies, New York will have to undergo a hyper-densification to accommodate its growing populace. But what’s to happen when the existing networks of infrastructure and housing have reached their maximum capacity?

After the Street, an ‘Experiments in Motion‘ studio sponsored by Columbia University GSAPP and Audi of America, charged eight students to develop an answer to this very problem. Recent grads Mengyi Fan and Marc Moukarzel responded by looking to the street to find the city’s great "unexploited building space" where they think the next step in New York’s (inward) expansion will unfold.

From its assassination by Le Corbusier to its later resurrection by Jane Jacobs and subsequent shirking by Robert Moses, the street–that erstwhile urban corridor, artery, thorough way according to which metropolitan life is oriented and activated–has occupied a central role in the polemics and design of the future city.

Yet Fan and Moukarzel’s proposal neither replicates the “violence” of the Modernists (or at least, that of its colorful language), nor the quaint fabricated stage sets of their pomo successors. Instead, the project references the hallucinogenic, neon-tinged city-worlds of Philip K. Dick novels and their subsequent film adaptations (see this year’s "Total Recall"), borrowing from them their impossibly dense and layered networks of buildings and infrastructure.

Beyond the Street presents a new strategy for density through a “multiplication of the street”, one suspended above the ground plane yet horizontally stratified so as to create all new, fully articulated urban spaces. That is to say, spaces not just for vehicular and pedestrian circulation, but places to foster new urban experiences. Fan and Moukarzel liken this stratification to Rem Koolhaas’s case studies in Delirious New York which investigated the sectional eclecticism contained within the formal body of the skyscraper, a spatial development made possible only by the elevator and the vertical dimension it opened up. This technological leap in building design “led to the relationship between the reproduction of floor slabs and the juxtapositive nature of the programs on each floor”. “If the street is approached in a similar way”, the duo write, “how can its identity be reinforced through juxtaposition and reproduction?”

The designers proposed pulling the street apart and compressing it into new “sandwiched” structures that could be inserted into the gaps between adjacent buildings. These would be balanced atop thin armatures anchored at ground level, minimizing their footprint and, thus, allowing the street to fulfill its more traditional function of moving cars and people.

Still, the relationship of street to storefront will have changed significantly, with existing infrastructure combined with new programs and circulation cores to ensure points of access to the blocks above. It follows, then, that the nature of the street would be irrevocably altered, but also made to adapt to the specific needs of its users.

“If the block is deemed as private ownership, then the street is a communal relationship. If the scenario is explored as a masterplan with many collaborators, then it could also convey a new rethinking of zoning laws. As an incentive, owners and developers give back street space to build or expand into it. It is not just an incentive, it also creates new social spaces and improves quality of life on a scale relative to the multiplicity of the street.”

Fan and Moukarzel envision these opportunistic structures to accommodate start-ups, creative agencies, and artist studios on the cheap. They would also contain residential clusters, shops, and cultural venues, not to mention public parks (think the High Line)–all diverse environments that would enrich the fabric of New York’s celebrated urbanscape.

See more of the project here, or browse on to Experiments in Motion for more on the studio. Plus, head over to the “Imagining the Lowline” exhibition (September 15-27) in the Lower East Side, where Experiments in Motion have installed a 50-foot model of Manhattan that charts the future of mobility latent within the city’s substructure.

This post originally appeared on Architizer, an Atlantic partner site.

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. Equity

    What the New Urban Anchors Owe Their Cities

    Corporations like Google and Amazon reap the spoils of winner-take-all urbanism. Here’s how they can also bear greater responsibility.

  2. Rescue crews and observers on top of the rubble from a collapsed building that fell in the Condesa neighborhood of Mexico City.

    A Brigade of Architects and Engineers Rushed to Assess Earthquake Damage in Mexico City

    La Casa del Arquitecto became the headquarters for highly skilled urbanists looking to help and determine why some buildings suffered more spectacularly than others.

  3. A LimeBike is pictured next to a Capital Bikeshare dock.

    Bike Share, Unplanned

    Three private bike-share companies are determined to shake up the streets of D.C. But what, exactly, are they trying to disrupt?

  4. Amazon's Seattle headquarters is pictured.

    The Ultimate List of Top Contenders for Amazon's HQ2

    We sorted through the longshots and likely contenders so you don’t have to.

  5. A Juggalo standing in front of Buffalo City Hall.

    The Juggalo March Is Not a Joke

    Facepainted fans of the Insane Clown Posse are gathering on the National Mall this weekend. And they have something important to say.