Joe Skipper/Reuters

Let's hope outrage over the Marlins deal never fades away.

Cities readers know that one of my biggest economic development peeves — right alongside government-backed casinos — is the gargantuan public giveaway to professional sports stadiums. And according to the Brookings Institution's Adie Tomer and Siddharth Kulkarni, writing earlier this month in the Sun Sentinel, the outrageous, over-the-top deal for the new Miami Marlins stadium should once and for all end the "era of publicly funded stadiums."

As has been widely reported in the Miami press, the Marlins's owner, Jeffrey Loria, was able to extract government backing for the  new, architecturally innovative $600 million stadium. After promising the region that he would create a winner as well as attract some big name free agents, Loria then let go of several star players in a $160 million payroll dump via a ludicrous deal with the Toronto Blue Jays. But as Tomer and Kulkarni point out, the deal is even more disastrous than it seems:

The public was responsible for 70 percent of the total bill, while the ownership received revenues from public parking in addition to ticket sales. But the worst part may be the methods used to finance that public share. The Miami-Dade County Commission sold $500 million worth of public bonds, all of which were financed during poor market conditions resulting in higher interest rates. 

The end result: a total public bill of $2.4 billion over 40 years. And you thought $600 million sounded expensive.

They point to a similar stadium boondoggle in Cincinnati where the public sector (in this case Hamilton County) was left with a bill of more than $550 million dollars. The public debt on that stadium now consumes "over 16 percent of the county's annual budget," they write, "forcing the county to cut youth services and other public programs."

I'm a big sports fan. Successful pro sports teams help bolster community morale and regional pride, as Tomer and Kulkarni point out. But I fail to see why taxpayers should subsidize wealthy owners and players. And that is finally becoming a more widely shared public sentiment, especially when these sweetheart stadium deals help bankrupt cities and counties and drain precious public funding away from essential public services.

Top image: Miami Marlins starting pitcher Ricky Nolasco throws the first pitch to New York Yankees shortstop Derek Jeter during their MLB spring training baseball game in Miami, Florida on April 1. The game is the first Major League game played in the new Marlins Park stadium. (Joe Skipper/Reuters)

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. A sign outside a storefront in Buffalo, New York.
    Environment

    Will Buffalo Become a Climate Change Haven?

    The Western New York city possesses a distinct mix of weather, geography, and infrastructure that could make it a potential climate haven. But for whom?

  2. photo: A vacant home in Oakland that is about to demolished for an apartment complex.
    Equity

    Fix California's Housing Crisis, Activists Say. But Which One?

    As a controversy over unoccupied homes in the Bay Area and Los Angeles reveals, advocates disagree about what kind of housing should be built, and where.

  3. photo: a high-speed train in Switzerland
    Transportation

    The Case for Portland-to-Vancouver High-Speed Rail

    At the Cascadia Rail Summit outside Seattle, a fledgling scheme to bring high-speed rail from Portland to Vancouver found an enthusiastic reception.

  4. A syringe sits on top of a car. Houses are behind it.
    Life

    The Changing Geography of the Opioid Crisis

    A new study shows that the country faces different opioid challenges in urban and rural areas.

  5. Environment

    The City Known for ‘Sewer Socialists’ Actually Has Great Sewers

    Milwaukee now averages a mere 2.4 combined sewer overflows a year, thanks to a massive underground tunnel, green infrastructure, and flood-control measures.

×