Reuters

Are you listening, Mayor Bloomberg?

If you've been into a Burger King or a Panera lately – even outside of Michael Bloomberg's healthy-eating Eden of New York City – your eyes have likely glazed over a new row of numbers on the menu board. The Affordable Care Act mandated that restaurant chains with 20 or more outposts publish calorie counts for your consideration right next to the WHOPPER sandwich meal (1,160 calories) or the bread bowl of broccoli cheddar (960 calories!).

The idea, a classic nudge, was that consumers might curb their intake of fatty food if they had calorie counts staring them down at the decisive moment of purchase. As it has turned out, though, most of us are entirely unmoved by this data. Research suggests that calorie labeling has no effect on decision-making for most diners. Your own experience probably tells you this, too.

So how about some even more creative prodding? Researchers at Texas Christian University and the UT Southwestern Medical Center have proposed an alternative: Instead of warning people of how many calories they're about to consume, tell them how long they would have to walk to burn the calories off. Eyeing a quarter-pound double cheeseburger? That's two hours. And we're talking a brisk walk here, not a post-meal stroll.

In a study (not yet published), the researchers presented 300 adults, aged 18-30, with menus labeled with straight calorie counts, no calories at all, or the exercise needed – in minutes of walking – to burn off those calories. All three menus listed the same food and drink items (and the people looking at them had no clue what these researchers were up to). Subjects faced with the prospect of exercise wound up ordering and consuming fewer calories. There was no difference between the other two groups.

Other demographics might respond differently to this not-so-subtle reminder that there's only one good way to burn off a Big Mac once you've downed it. And there's obviously a separate conversation to be had about whether restaurants should be compelled to discourage customers from eating their tastiest products. But we like that public health researchers have found a way to leverage America's widespread aversion to walking: threaten people with the idea of it at the drive-through window.

Top image: Mike Blake/Reuters

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. Design

    What Cities Can Do to Help Birds and Bees Survive

    Pollinators—the wildlife that shuffle pollen between flowers—are being decimated. But they may still thrive with enough help from urban humans.

  2. Apple's planned new campus in Austin, Texas.
    Life

    Why Apple Bet on Austin’s Suburbs for Its Next Big Expansion

    By adding thousands more jobs outside the Texas capital, Apple has followed a tech expansion playbook that may just exacerbate economic inequality.

  3. Transportation

    CityLab University: Induced Demand

    When traffic-clogged highways are expanded, new drivers quickly materialize to fill them. What gives? Here’s how “induced demand” works.

  4. a photo of a woman covering her ears on a noisy NYC subway platform
    Life

    My Quixotic Quest for Quiet in New York City

    In a booming city, the din of new construction and traffic can be intolerable. Enter Hush City, an app to map the sounds of silence.   

  5. Four young adults exercise in a dark, neon-lit gym.
    Life

    Luxury Gyms Invite You to Work Out, Hang Out, Or Just Work

    With their invite-only policies and coworking spaces, high-end urban gyms aspire to be fitness studio, social club, and office rolled into one.

×