The "Plaza to the Forgotten War" design, submitted by Andrew Cesarz and Johnsen Schmaling Architects. United States World War One Centennial Commission

There’s only one worth keeping, and it’s not even in the contest.

A new memorial to those who fought in World War I could take the form of a winding pedestrian path through a garden or a plaza with framed images sunken into the ground. Or, the monument might be a series of 1,166 illuminated bronze markers. Or a plaza framed by walls with soldiers carved in bas-relief, combining features of memorials to the wars in Vietnam and Korea.

But the design that wins final approval for a National World War I Memorial in Washington, D.C., likely won’t preserve much of the World War I memorial that already exists on the site chosen for the next monument to the Great War.

On Wednesday, the U.S. World War One Centennial Commission announced five finalist designs for the National World War I Memorial. A design jury narrowed down the final five from more than 350 entries submitted in an open design contest. The memorial, if it is eventually approved by stakeholders and funded by donors, will be built in Pershing Park in Washington, D.C.

Part of the “Heroes’ Green” design, submitted by Maria Counts and Counts Studio. (U.S. World War One Centennial Commission)

Few of the overall entries—and none of the finalist designs—takes any heed of the existing memorial there, to U.S. Army General John Joseph “Black Jack” Pershing, who led American forces during World War I. The sunken water garden and stair-step plaza at Pershing Park were designed by M. Paul Friedberg, with contributions from the firm Oehme, van Sweden & Associates, making it one of the most pedigreed parks in D.C. However, the park has been subject to gross neglect for years. The fountain and water features no longer function; the distinctive water-garden plantings are long since gone.

The design competition for the new memorial sparked an outcry from preservationists, namely The Cultural Landscape Foundation, which pledged to seek historic preservation status for Pershing Park. Architectural Record spoke to Friedberg, who was charged up over the proposal to pave over his World War I memorial to build a new World War I memorial.

The “World War One Memorial Concept” design, submitted by Devin Kimmel and Kimmel Studio. (U.S. World War One Centennial Commission)

The jury, which includes architects, critics, and scholars, will select a final design from the five to proceed toward realization. But preservationists aim to push stakeholders to consider whether any of the new park and memorial designs should succeed the existing park. Selecting a design is also just the start of the process; the commission will need to raise $20 million or more to build it. Meanwhile, the original Pershing Park design could be restored for far less.

The designs point to very open questions about the purpose of this memorial—or any memorial. The “Heroes’ Green” entry appears to be the most open to public use and interpretation, whereas the bas-relief walls of “The Weight of Sacrifice” or the 1,166 bronze markers for the “Plaza to the Forgotten War” design speak to a more solemn experience. “An American Family Portrait Wall in the Park” features framed images set into the ground: unprecedented (and strange). To round out the finalist phase, there’s the obligatory, inoffensive, utterly forgettable classical offering (“World War One Memorial Concept”).

In selecting a final design, the jury has to ask itself an important question: Do any of these proposals improve on Pershing Park, a contemplative, modernist landscape memorial, the way it stands now? (That is, when it’s being responsibly maintained)? If not, why should we spend so much more to achieve so much less?

Design for “An American Family Portrait Wall in the Park,” submitted by Luis Collado, Jose Luis de la Fuente, Jose Luis Perez-Griffo, Ignacio Espigares, Marta Bueno, Shoko Nakamura, and STL Architects. (U.S. World War One Centennial Commission)
Design for “The Weight of Sacrifice,” an entry submitted by Joseph Weishaar. (U.S. World War One Centennial Commission)

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. Bicycle riders on a package-blocked bicycle lane
    Perspective

    Why Do Micromobility Advocates Have Tiny-Demand Syndrome?

    In the 1930s big auto dreamed up freeways and demanded massive car infrastructure. Micromobility needs its own Futurama—one where cars are marginalized.

  2. a photo of a WeWork office building
    Life

    What WeWork’s Demise Could Do to NYC Real Estate

    The troubled coworking company is the largest office tenant in New York City. What happens to the city’s commercial real estate market if it goes under?

  3. a photo of cyclists riding beside a streetcar in the Mid Market neighborhood in San Francisco, California.
    Transportation

    San Francisco’s Busiest Street Is Going Car-Free

    A just-approved plan will redesign Market Street to favor bikes, pedestrians, and public transit vehicles. But the vote to ban private cars didn’t happen overnight.

  4. a photo of Extinction Rebellion climate change protesters in London
    Environment

    When Climate Activists Target Public Transit

    The climate protest movement Extinction Rebellion is facing a backlash after disrupting commuters on the London Underground.

  5. A photo of an abandoned building in Providence, Rhode Island.
    Perspective

    There's No Such Thing as a Dangerous Neighborhood

    Most serious urban violence is concentrated among less than 1 percent of a city’s population. So why are we still criminalizing whole areas?

×