Which of these buildings will look better in 100 years? The Art-Deco Empire State Building with One World Trade Center rising behind it Lucas Jackson/Reuters

A team of architects tried to understand the appeal of New York City’s most-loved buildings by recreating them for the 21st century.

Given that it was once deeply out of fashion and didn’t even receive its name until the late 1960s, the Art Deco style of architecture has proved surprisingly durable. Known for its streamlined forms, bright colors, and imaginative flourishes, Art Deco is more fluid and eclectic than the rigid International Style that emerged in the same period. This style of the 1920s and ’30s is widely loved almost a century later.

The crown of the Chrysler Building (Lucas Jackson/Reuters)
The 49th Street entrance of 30 Rockefeller Plaza (Wally Gobetz/Flickr)

Designers at Hollwich Kushner, a New York architecture firm, noticed that many of the city’s major landmarks—the Empire State Building, the Chrysler Building, the Waldorf-Astoria—were Deco buildings. Curious about what gives the style its enduring appeal, they came up with an experiment: What if they tried redesigning these historic buildings for today, using contemporary techniques and materials?

“We basically absorbed the quality of these old buildings and created a progressive reinterpretation of them,” says Matthias Hollwich, a partner of Hollwich Kushner.

The results are compiled in “New(er) York,” a booklet that identifies 12 Art Deco icons (well, 11 and one non-Deco exception, the Flatiron Building) and reveals their 21st-century digital doppelgängers. The new buildings look … not Art Deco. At all. The Chrysler Building has become a stalagmite. The Eldorado, on Central Park West, has morphed into three shiny towers, rising at bulbous curves from their base.

The Eldorado: old (mattdwen/Flickr)
The Eldorado: new (Courtesy of Hollwich Kushner)

To redesign the landmarks, first, the architects studied them using 3D modeling software. Next, they stripped away details to focus on the buildings’ massing (their overall forms) and proportions. Then they reinterpreted that massing, and finally applied contemporary facades to the new models.

The designs may not bring to mind jazz and speakeasies, but they’re eye-catching. Hollwich Kushner’s answer to One Wall Street, a monumental 1931 tower, translates the building’s setbacks into jagged layers of glass and limestone panels, and dissolves the original solid crown into a splintered apex. A 16-story office building in Chelsea, 214 West 29th Street, has its tiers smoothed into a unified mass, with angled walls and prominent vertical ribs that draw the gaze up. Not surprisingly, the speculative buildings in “New(er) York” echo other projects by the firm.

One Wall Street (Courtesy of Hollwich Kushner)
214 West 29th Street (Courtesy of Hollwich Kushner)

Hollwich says he and his colleagues did glean some insights into Art Deco’s power. The buildings’ solidity “makes [them] look incredibly strong and stable,” he says. Their exteriors have depth, as opposed to the two-dimensional facades of many contemporary buildings. Also, “these buildings always have a hierarchy,” he adds. “They never unify all elements, but there’s an overruling unity.”

The redesigned One Wall Street has faceted panels on its exterior. (Courtesy of Hollwich Kushner)

In the early 20th century, Modernist architects rejected ornamentation as useless and impure. Then Postmodernism attempted to bring it back, with mixed results. Hollwich is not a fan of Postmodernism, but “New(er) York”  grapples with how to include an abstracted kind of ornament in progressive architecture today. This is something we’re seeing more of, from the revival of terracotta (once used on Deco buildings) to patterned filigree skins. Whatever is emerging may not be the next Art Deco. But it’s a breath of fresh air in the age of the boring glass box.

“Some of these buildings that try to copy the older masters devalue them by becoming cheap-looking copies of them,” Hollwich says. “It’s a dangerous line to walk. But [through] all of these design reviews, we felt comfortable where we landed. It’s a great middle ground between historic inspiration and futuristic vision.”

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. A photo of Andrew Field, the owner of Rockaway Taco, looking out from his store in the Rockaway Beach neighborhood of the Queens borough of New York.

    Tacos and Transit: Rate Your City

    From taco-rich San Diego to the tortilla wastelands of Boston, we asked you to grade U.S. cities on two critical metrics: Mexican food and public transportation.

  2. Young students walking towards a  modern wood building surrounded by snow and trees

    Norway’s Energy-Positive Building Spree Is Here

    Oslo’s Powerhouse collective wants buildings that make better cities in the face of climate change.

  3. Apple's planned new campus in Austin, Texas.

    Why Apple Bet on Austin’s Suburbs for Its Next Big Expansion

    By adding thousands more jobs outside the Texas capital, Apple has followed a tech expansion playbook that may just exacerbate economic inequality.

  4. A man uses his mobile phone at night near food stalls at a festival in New York.

    So You Want to Be a ‘Night Mayor’

    As U.S. cities hire nightlife officials, we talked to people on the job about what they really do—and why you shouldn’t call them “night mayors” at all.

  5. A photo of shoppers in the central textile market of downtown Jakarta.

    How Cities Design Themselves

    Urban planner Alain Bertaud’s new book, Order Without Design, argues that cities are really shaped by market forces, not visionaries.