Which of these buildings will look better in 100 years? The Art-Deco Empire State Building with One World Trade Center rising behind it Lucas Jackson/Reuters

A team of architects tried to understand the appeal of New York City’s most-loved buildings by recreating them for the 21st century.

Given that it was once deeply out of fashion and didn’t even receive its name until the late 1960s, the Art Deco style of architecture has proved surprisingly durable. Known for its streamlined forms, bright colors, and imaginative flourishes, Art Deco is more fluid and eclectic than the rigid International Style that emerged in the same period. This style of the 1920s and ’30s is widely loved almost a century later.

The crown of the Chrysler Building (Lucas Jackson/Reuters)
The 49th Street entrance of 30 Rockefeller Plaza (Wally Gobetz/Flickr)

Designers at Hollwich Kushner, a New York architecture firm, noticed that many of the city’s major landmarks—the Empire State Building, the Chrysler Building, the Waldorf-Astoria—were Deco buildings. Curious about what gives the style its enduring appeal, they came up with an experiment: What if they tried redesigning these historic buildings for today, using contemporary techniques and materials?

“We basically absorbed the quality of these old buildings and created a progressive reinterpretation of them,” says Matthias Hollwich, a partner of Hollwich Kushner.

The results are compiled in “New(er) York,” a booklet that identifies 12 Art Deco icons (well, 11 and one non-Deco exception, the Flatiron Building) and reveals their 21st-century digital doppelgängers. The new buildings look … not Art Deco. At all. The Chrysler Building has become a stalagmite. The Eldorado, on Central Park West, has morphed into three shiny towers, rising at bulbous curves from their base.

The Eldorado: old (mattdwen/Flickr)
The Eldorado: new (Courtesy of Hollwich Kushner)

To redesign the landmarks, first, the architects studied them using 3D modeling software. Next, they stripped away details to focus on the buildings’ massing (their overall forms) and proportions. Then they reinterpreted that massing, and finally applied contemporary facades to the new models.

The designs may not bring to mind jazz and speakeasies, but they’re eye-catching. Hollwich Kushner’s answer to One Wall Street, a monumental 1931 tower, translates the building’s setbacks into jagged layers of glass and limestone panels, and dissolves the original solid crown into a splintered apex. A 16-story office building in Chelsea, 214 West 29th Street, has its tiers smoothed into a unified mass, with angled walls and prominent vertical ribs that draw the gaze up. Not surprisingly, the speculative buildings in “New(er) York” echo other projects by the firm.

One Wall Street (Courtesy of Hollwich Kushner)
214 West 29th Street (Courtesy of Hollwich Kushner)

Hollwich says he and his colleagues did glean some insights into Art Deco’s power. The buildings’ solidity “makes [them] look incredibly strong and stable,” he says. Their exteriors have depth, as opposed to the two-dimensional facades of many contemporary buildings. Also, “these buildings always have a hierarchy,” he adds. “They never unify all elements, but there’s an overruling unity.”

The redesigned One Wall Street has faceted panels on its exterior. (Courtesy of Hollwich Kushner)

In the early 20th century, Modernist architects rejected ornamentation as useless and impure. Then Postmodernism attempted to bring it back, with mixed results. Hollwich is not a fan of Postmodernism, but “New(er) York”  grapples with how to include an abstracted kind of ornament in progressive architecture today. This is something we’re seeing more of, from the revival of terracotta (once used on Deco buildings) to patterned filigree skins. Whatever is emerging may not be the next Art Deco. But it’s a breath of fresh air in the age of the boring glass box.

“Some of these buildings that try to copy the older masters devalue them by becoming cheap-looking copies of them,” Hollwich says. “It’s a dangerous line to walk. But [through] all of these design reviews, we felt comfortable where we landed. It’s a great middle ground between historic inspiration and futuristic vision.”

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. Environment

    Let's All Swim in the Once-Filthy Canals of Paris

    Unlike many cities, the French capital has made good on its promise to re-open urban waterways to bathers. How did they do it?  

  2. Transportation

    5 Reasons to Be Wary of Elon Musk's Hyperloop

    High-speed vactrains might be the ticket for a Martian colony. As a practical transit investment for Earth, the technology has a long way to go.

  3. The Salk Institute, near San Diego
    Design

    This Is Your Brain on Architecture

    In her new book, Sarah Williams Goldhagen presents scientific evidence for why some buildings delight us and others—too many of them—disappoint.

  4. Life

    Say Goodbye to Spain's Glorious Three-Hour Lunch Break

    Catalonia plans to shorten work hours—but don’t call it the end of the siesta.

  5. Transportation

    Honolulu's Rapid Transit Crisis

    Traffic in Hawaii’s capital is terrible, but construction on a rail system may now cost as much as $13 billion while alleviating road congestion by as little as one percent.