Shutterstock.com

If it comes down to it, water-shooting ships just might help geoengineer us away from a hotter future, according to some new research.

Battling a big problem like climate change will require big ideas. And scientists in the U.K. have one of the biggest: take ocean water, shoot it up into the atmosphere, and let the resulting clouds cool the earth like a massive, wet blanket.

Granted, these folks are not the first to float this incredible-sounding strategy, known as "marine-cloud brightening." In one example, the physicist John Latham wrote in 1990 that the life of clouds might be prolonged by artificially increasing their "droplet concentration." These thicker clouds would reflect more of the sun's radiation away from the planet, in theory allowing its fever to diminish.

But researchers at the University of Manchester and elsewhere have drafted a road map for what they think is the world's best marine cloud-seeding plan. They envision a fleet of ships traveling the oceans, spraying vast quantities of seawater into the ether with a technique called the "Rayleigh jet." (In this study, the Rayleigh's efficiency beat other methods such as the "Taylor cone jet" and "effervescent spray atomization.") Dispersed in the higher altitudes, the water would leave behind fine salt crystals that serve as nuclei for cloud formation.

Here's the takeaway of their paper, recently published in the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A:

The researchers tested each technique so there was an increase in reflection of 5%, a figure that would combat the predicted effects of increased carbon dioxide levels over the rest of this century. They then looked at how much energy each would consume.

The scientists say that the Rayleigh jet method could produce the desired effect using 30 megawatts of energy, about the same energy that two large ships produce.

So is this the answer to our overheated world's problems? Maybe not, as the desirability of geoengineering tactics is much in debate. Perhaps the most basic issue is we probably won't be able to tell if they're working. "[H]ow much sunlight Earth reflects naturally varies a lot—not just from place to place and season to season, but even for the same month from year to year," writes NOAA. "The bigger the range of natural variability, the greater the odds that any evidence of a manmade effort to brighten up the planet would be lost in the 'background noise.'"

The most variable parts of the planet in terms of reflectivity are shown as lighter regions. Data is from 2000-2012. (NOAA)

There's also the concern that denser clouds could interfere with solar-energy infrastructure, a key component in moving away from carbon fuels. Seeding the atmosphere with aerosols could lead to a drop in energy production at solar facilities of as much as 20 percent, according to one NOAA study. And in a 2011 paper in Climatic Change, scientists threw out two more objections: that putting resources into geoengineering rather than cutting emissions "constitutes a conscious risk transfer to future generations, in violation of principles of intergenerational justice," and it could be disastrous if things were to go wrong:

A failure to maintain the aerosol counterforcing (for example in the case of a war, a breakdown of an international agreement, or the discovery of sizable negative effects due to the aerosol forcing) would lead to an abrupt warming with rates that are unprecedented for modern human societies and would likely cause sizeable economic damages.

Perhaps that's why the U.K.'s Paul Connolly, an atmospheric scientist involved in this latest research, sounds cautious about this oceanic-pumping scheme. "I am not recommending that we use any of these techniques now, but it is important to know how best to use them should they become necessary," he says. "Should no progress be made to reduce CO2 levels, then geoengineering techniques, similar to this, might become necessary to avoid dangerous rises in global temperatures."

Top image: /Shutterstock.com

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. Equity

    Capturing Black Bottom, a Detroit Neighborhood Lost to Urban Renewal

    “Black Bottom Street View,” now exhibiting at the Detroit Public Library, thoughtfully displays old images of the historic African American neighborhood in its final days.

  2. Transportation

    You Can’t Design Bike-Friendly Cities Without Considering Race and Class

    Bike equity is a powerful tool for reducing inequality. Too often, cycling infrastructure is tailored only to wealthy white cyclists.

  3. Design

    A History of the American Public Library

    A visual exploration of how a critical piece of social infrastructure came to be.

  4. Amazon HQ2

    Without Amazon HQ2, What Happens to Housing in Queens?

    The arrival of the tech company’s new headquarters was set to shake up the borough’s real estate market, driving up rents and spurring displacement. Now what?

  5. Multi-colored maps of Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Tampa, denoting neighborhood fragmentation
    Equity

    Urban Neighborhoods, Once Distinct by Race and Class, Are Blurring

    Yet in cities, affluent white neighborhoods and high-poverty black ones are outliers, resisting the fragmentation shown with other types of neighborhoods.