Richie Fredell, 38, a paramedic, looks at the remains of his childhood home in Ventura, California, on December 8, 2017.
Those masks don't do much, sadly. Ben Gruber/Reuters

As larger and more destructive wildfires become the new normal, cities will need to deal with the public health impacts.

Over the past few days, the mountains of Santa Barbara have slowly disappeared in a cloud of smoke. As the Thomas Fire continues to burn along the coast, Santa Barbara’s green slopes have faded away behind a wall of yellow haze.

The people of the American West are expected to endure more large, destructive wildfires in the future, the result of both climate change and more development in wild areas. As a result, more communities will likely have to deal with extended periods of intense wildfire smoke. Public health agencies are just starting to figure out how to deal with that risk on a community level. We spoke with public-health researchers who have studied wildfire smoke, some of whom saw their own communities shrouded during brush fires this summer. Here’s what we learned.

In the short term

Studies have found that, during past forest fires, surrounding communities saw upticks in visits to the hospital for asthma, heart symptoms, and respiratory illnesses such as pneumonia and bronchitis. Young children and the elderly were often most affected. Studies have noted slight increases in deaths during periods of intense smoke; researchers attribute those deaths to elderly people with pre-existing heart or lung conditions.

Interestingly, pneumonia and bronchitis are caused by viruses and bacteria, not pollution. Researchers believe pollution negatively affects immune cells in the lungs, making the lungs less effective at sweeping away infections. But that effect probably only lasts a few days, says Michael Brauer, a professor of population health at the University of British Columbia.

In the long term

Overall, there aren’t very many studies of the health effects of wildfire smoke because, historically, intense periods of smoke pollution were not common. It is also difficult to test the long-term effects of a short period of smoke exposure. Fortunately, researchers believe short periods of smoke exposure probably don’t have long-lasting effects on healthy people. “There are parallels to maintaining a good diet; one chocolate chip cookie isn’t going cause significant weight gain, but a cookie every day likely will lead to weight gain,” writes Richard Peltier, an environmental health researcher with the University of Massachusetts–Amherst.

In someone with a pre-existing heart or lung condition, however, smoke might cause a serious enough problem that it alters the course of their disease, Brauer says.

There are few studies of pregnant women exposed to wildfire smoke. One study of women who were pregnant during very large fires in Southern California in October of 2003 found that their babies tended to weigh up to a third of an ounce less than babies who had gestated entirely before or after the fires. The lower weights could have been caused by air pollution, the psychological stress of fires, or both, the study’s authors write in their paper, published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives. A difference of a third of an ounce is unlikely to affect a baby’s health, the scientists add, but there’s some debate about whether lower birth weights might reveal subtle patterns in a whole cohort of babies.

What to do about the smoke

It’s a good idea to stay indoors, especially in spaces that filter their air, and not to exercise outside, experts say. Pacific Standard collected some practical tips here, including ideas for home, public spaces, and driving.

In Santa Barbara, residents have been wandering around with masks or scarves covering their faces. But researchers caution against such solutions. “Poor quality masks, handkerchiefs or similar will not really help at all,” Curtis Noonan, an epidemiologist at the University of Montana, writes in an email. Santa Barbara County, in partnership with charitable organizations, has been handing out free N95 face masks, which remove at least 95 percent of small particles in the air. Typically, construction workers and other laborers wear them during jobs that put them in close contact with dangerous dust. N95 masks do work to filter out smoke pollutants, experts agree, but they have to be properly fitted, close to the face. (Brauer also cautions against getting a false sense of security from a mask. It’s still important to remain indoors, he explains.)

How communities can prepare for the future

In the longer term, many communities will need to develop strategies that will serve them in case fires and smoke become annual or near-annual events. “That was what we were saying here all summer, that this is the new normal,” Brauer says. This past summer, Vancouver, British Columbia, where he is based, endured thick, smoky air from nearby wildfires for about a week. “You kept hearing the word ‘apocalypse,’” Brauer says.

Experts encourage communities to designate “clean air centers,” where people can spend time in filtered air for free. There’s precedent for this: Many cities already offer air-conditioned public cooling centers, recognizing that deaths increase across cities when it’s hot.

Doctors could also warn their patients when fire season is coming, making sure they have the needed medications for any lung and heart conditions. Home air filters are also a good idea.

While communities evacuate because of fire risk, doing so for smoke is a tricky balance of priorities, Brauer says. People may become more exposed to smoke while evacuating than they would have had they simply stayed home. Plus, evacuation can be a distressing experience.

People should also be mindful of their mental health. It can be scary to live under the pall of smoke, especially knowing that wildfires may become more commonplace in the future. During the smoky days in Vancouver, “people were really feeling quite down,” Brauer says. “I think part of that is just losing control. There’s not that much you can do. You can’t run from this. You can’t hide from it.” But take heart: Indoor air filters really do work, most health problems seem temporary, and one day the smoke will clear and the mountains will reappear.

This story originally appeared on Pacific Standard, an editorial partner site. Subscribe to the magazine in print and follow Pacific Standard on Twitter to support journalism in the public interest.

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. photo: Former HUD secretary Julián Castro

    How to Head Off a Coronavirus Housing Crisis

    Former HUD secretary and presidential candidate Julián Castro has ideas for state and federal leaders on protecting vulnerable renters from a housing disaster.

  2. Equity

    We'll Need To Reopen Our Cities. But Not Without Making Changes First.

    We must prepare for a protracted battle with coronavirus. But there are changes we can make now to prepare locked-down cities for what’s next.

  3. photo: a For Rent sign in a window in San Francisco.

    Do Landlords Deserve a Coronavirus Bailout, Too?

    Some renters and homeowners are getting financial assistance during the economic disruption from the coronavirus pandemic. What about landlords?

  4. Coronavirus

    Black Businesses Are Not Getting the Coronavirus Relief They Deserve

    The latest U.S. coronavirus aid package promises a partial and uneven economic recovery that leaves behind the African American community.

  5. photo: South Korean soldiers attempt to disinfect the sidewalks of Seoul's Gagnam district in response to the spread of COVID-19.

    Pandemics Are Also an Urban Planning Problem

    Will COVID-19 change how cities are designed? Michele Acuto of the Connected Cities Lab talks about density, urbanization and pandemic preparation.