Shutterstock

We need more mortgage lenders. 75 percent of the biggest home lenders in 2006 no longer exist.

All you had to do was say yes. That was what it used to take to get a home loan. Of course, you're probably old enough to remember 2006, back when "tarp" was just a word for what baseball uses during rain delays. But the lenders who made those loans? Don't ask them if they remember 2006. They don't exist anymore.
 
Well, mostly. Only five of the 20 biggest mortgage originators from 2006 are still around independently today. The rest either filed for bankruptcy or got bought as the mortgage market imploded in 2007 and 2008, as the table below from SNL Financial shows.
 
Mortgage2006.png
 
This is what capitalism looks like, kind of. Lenders that weren't too big to fail did fail, and then got scooped up for what buyers thought were bargain basement prices — or in Countrywide's case, managed to market themselves before the market completely collapsed. But all this consolidation has left lenders a bit understaffed. The chart below from Bank of America Merrill Lynch looks at employment in the mortgage industry from the height of the housing bubble till today. This is what weak demand in a time of mergers looks like.
 
MortgageEmployment.png
What happens when demand comes back? Nothing, and that's the problem. If there aren't enough mortgage originators when more people want mortgages, rates won't fall as much as they otherwise would. And if rates don't fall as much as they otherwise would, housing won't recover as much as it otherwise would, and there won't be as many jobs as there otherwise would be.

This isn't a hypothetical. It's what's happening now. A lack of lenders already seems to be blunting the impact of QE3 — as the Financial Times points out, rates haven't fallen nearly as much as mortgage-backed security prices have risen. A professor named Ben Bernanke famously argued that these kind of financial bottlenecks slowed the recovery from the worst of the Great Depression — what he called "non-monetary factors" — as banks didn't have the requisite expertise or infrastructure to pass along cheap credit to would-be borrowers. It's not quite as bad this time around because we didn't let the financial system fall into the abyss, we threw money at it and midwifed mergers instead. So it should be easier for banks to ramp up their lending capacity now.
 
In other words, too big to fail might save us from not doing the same things that caused the crash — more housing and more debt — and, at least for that, we should be grateful. We don't want to go back to 2006, but we don't want to stay in 2010 forever either.

Photo credit: luxorphoto/Shutterstock
 
This post originally appeared on The Atlantic.

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. Environment

    Britain's Next Megaproject: A Coast-to-Coast Forest

    The plan is for 50 million new trees to repopulate one of the least wooded parts of the country—and offer a natural escape from several cities in the north.

  2. A small accessory dwelling unit—known as an ADU—is attached to an older single-family home in a Portland, Oregon, neighborhood.
    Design

    The Granny Flats Are Coming

    A new book argues that the U.S. is about to see more accessory dwelling units and guides homeowners on how to design and build them.

  3. U.S. Embassy in London
    Design

    America's Passive-Aggressive New Embassy Arrives in London

    Why can’t we let bunkers be bunkers?

  4. Life

    Escaping Poverty Requires Almost 20 Years With Nearly Nothing Going Wrong

    MIT economist Peter Temin argues that economic inequality results in two distinct classes. And only one of them has any power.

  5. Police cars outside the New York Port Authority Bus Terminal in New York City
    Life

    The Great Crime Decline and the Comeback of Cities

    Patrick Sharkey, author of Uneasy Peace, talks to CityLab about how the drop in crime has transformed American cities.