Jeff Wilcox

It's the District's third year atop Central Connecticut State's literacy rankings.

The rankings of America's most literate cities are beginning to look like the table of a European soccer league: the same cities are on top every year.

In 2012, Washington D.C. was the country's most "literate" city for the third year running. The rankings, put together by Central Connecticut State University President John W. Miller, integrate data on booksellers, libraries, newspapers, publishing, and education to calculate a broader measurement of literacy.

The top ten cities look familiar. With the exception of St. Louis and Atlanta, they all make frequent high appearances on quality-of-life indexes. They are also forging a dynasty atop Miller's CCSU's literacy rankings, which have been published since 2005. Here's this year's top ten, with the 2005 rank in parentheses:

Ranking City
1 Washington, D.C. (3)
2 Seattle (1)
3 Minneapolis (2)
4 Pittsburgh (8)
5 Denver (6)
6 St. Paul (10)
7 Boston (7)
8 Atlanta (4)
9 St. Louis (15)
10 Portland (11)


The top three cities are the same as they were in 2005, and after eight years, the top ten has only two newcomers.

That's quite surprising, considering the subject material. The publishing industry, which is broadly responsible for three of the study's six categories, has changed dramatically since CCSU first published the rankings. But despite the tumult in the world of bookstores, magazines and newspapers, the rankings look very similar.

Here's 2012's top ten cities for newspapers, weekday and Sunday circulation divided by population. Their 2005 rank is in parentheses.

Ranking City
1 Newark (1)
2 Minneapolis (3)
3 Santa Ana (9)
4 Washington, D.C. (2)
4 Cleveland (11)
6 Denver (7)
7 St. Paul (15)
8 Atlanta (5)
9 Pittsburgh (9)
9 St. Louis (8)


Eight years later, this top ten, too, is much the same. Are there no movers or shakers in newspaper circulation at this level?

Another potentially volatile category is Internet resources, where the rankings are a function (per capita) of library connections, public wireless access, Internet book orders, and online newspaper reading. 2005 was a rad year on the Internet, but it was a long time ago. Gmail and Facebook were a year old and scarcely used. Twitter and Reddit did not exist.

Yet there is only marginally more change here. The 2012 rankings, with 2005 in parentheses:

Ranking City
1 Washington D.C. (11)
2 Boston (2)
3 Oakland (5)
3 San Francisco (4)
3 San Jose (8)
6 Austin (3)
7 Seattle (1)
8 New York City (16)
9 Philadelphia (27)
10 Denver (7)

 
Seven of the top ten are the same. Only one city, Philadelphia, moves into the top ten from more than ten places away, jumping from 27th to 9th.

Plus ça change...

Top image: Flickr/Jeff Wilcox.

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. Life

    How Australia Conquered Guns, and Why America Can't

    Gun control advocates point to Australia for inspiration in ending gun violence. The Australian Ambassador to the United States, Joe Hockey, thinks they should stop.

  2. Equity

    The Bleeding of Chicago

    America’s third-largest city has built one of the world’s best trauma care systems. But that success might be obscuring the true scale of its gun violence.

  3. Equity

    When America's Basic Housing Unit Was a Bed, Not a House

    The same cities that struggle to provide affordable housing today eliminated their critical-but-maligned flexible housing stock after World War II.

  4. A sculpture of the Airbnb logo is pictured.
    Life

    Airbnb and the Unintended Consequences of 'Disruption'

    Tech analysts are prone to predicting utopia or dystopia. They’re worse at imagining the side effects of a firm's success.

  5. Equity

    The Wakanda Reader

    Everything you wanted to know about Wakanda and urbanism, but were afraid to ask.