Workers at Boeing's plants in Everett, Washington. The company received a $8.7 billion incentives package from the state in 2013. Reuters/Andy Clark

Nevada’s Gigafactory deal is just the latest of the roughly $70 billion in incentives governments have given companies since the mid-1970s.

Yesterday, I wrote about the state of Nevada’s winning $1.25 billion incentives package for Tesla’s Gigafactory, estimating the deal works out to between $56,000 and $385,000 per job, depending on how they are counted. But this is far from the only ginormous state hand-out to corporations. According to Good Jobs First, a watchdog group that tracks economic incentives, the number and dollar amounts of megadeals, or those worth $60 million or more, have been growing.

(Good Jobs First)

The first chart above, from Good Jobs First, shows the growth in the number of megadeals per year, while the second chart, below, shows the dollar value of these deals.

(Good Jobs First)

The value of these deals increased from $100 million in the 1970s to about a billion a year in the 1990s to more than $5 billion in 2003. And incentives hit a sky high $16 billion in 2013, on the backs of Washington State’s whopping $8.7 billion incentives package for Boeing. Two-thirds of the way through 2014, Good Jobs First estimates that incentives already top $7 billion. The Tesla deal comes in the wake of the $2 billion package the state of Oregon gave to Intel in August. For the past three and half decades, Good Jobs First estimates, states have given more than $70 billion in incentives to companies.

My own research and that of others shows there are little, if any, payoffs from such incentives. In fact, as I wrote yesterday, it is common for companies to have their best site already picked out and then use the handy bidding process to garner unnecessary incentive funds. Work from the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy found property-tax incentives are all too frequently given to companies that would have chosen the same location anyway. “So instead of creating new jobs or spurring employment, the main effect of incentives is simply to deplete a community's tax base,” I wrote in 2012. “Since poorer states and communities are more likely to use incentives in the first place, the end result is to undermine the resources and revenues of the places that can least afford it.”

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. A man and a woman shop at a modern kiosk by a beach in a vintage photo.
    Design

    Why Everyday Architecture Deserves Respect

    The places where we enact our daily lives are not grand design statements, yet they have an underrated charm and even nobility.

  2. a photo of Los Angeles in 1962
    Transportation

    Mapping the Effects of the Great 1960s ‘Freeway Revolts’

    Urbanites who battled the construction of the Interstate Highway System in the 1960s saved some neighborhoods—but many highways did transform cities.

  3. a photo of a small fleet of electric Chevrolet Bolts cars.
    Transportation

    Should Electric Vehicle Drivers Pay Per Mile?

    Since EV drivers zip past gas taxes, they don’t contribute to the federal fund for road maintenance. A new working paper tries to determine whether plug-ins should pay up.

  4. A chef prepares food at a restaurant in Beijing, China.
    Life

    What Restaurant Reviews Reveal About Cities

    Where official census data is sparse, MIT researchers find that restaurant review websites can offer similar demographic and economic information.

  5. A photo of anti-gentrification graffiti in Washington, D.C.
    Equity

    The Hidden Winners in Neighborhood Gentrification

    A new study claims the effects of neighborhood change on original lower-income residents are largely positive, despite fears of spiking rents and displacement.

×