A Nepalese woman sits against a wall of the still-standing Pashupatinath Temple, facing an empty coffin after Kathmandu's devastating earthquake. AP images

It wasn't a divine intervention that kept the ancient structure from being destroyed.

Behind the smoke rising from funeral pyres next to the Bagmati river, Kathmandu's Pashupatinath Temple solemnly stands—unharmed by Saturday's earthquake in Nepal. For the devout, the temple's resilience may seem like a divine miracle, given the scale of destruction caused by the disaster. But for urban planners and historic preservationists, it offers a lesson in earthquake-resilient building.

The exact reasons why the Kathmandu temple escaped virtually unscathed, when other historical sites were completely destroyed, warrants a technical investigation, according to Tej Kumar Karki, former resident and the town planning chief of Kathmandu city. In an email to CityLab, Karki outlines some structural features of the Pashupatinath Temple he thinks might explain its survival.

First, unlike the Durbar Square or Dharahara Tower (collapsed sites shown in the Tweets below), the Pashupatinath Temple isn't very tall. It is also made of solid material; its brick (as opposed to mortar) walls are held together by the strong metal sheets in its roof. And the temple, looked after by the Pashupati Area Development Trust, has been renovated a couple of times in the recent past "because of its importance, focus, and revenue generation capacity," writes Karki.

R.S. Jamwal of the Archeological Survey of India notes some of the temple's other structural assets to the Hindustan Times:

"The square pan of the temple, its light weight, the roofs and floors uniting with the walls and a strong jointing system helped. The quality of construction ... is also very high."

Of course, the earthquake-vulnerability of each historical site is different, based on its unique location, shape, and construction. But the architecture of the Pashupatinath Temple, at the very least, highlights the importance of good building material and smart engineering, which Kathmandu hasn't always employed in past reconstruction efforts. After the 1934 earthquake, for example, temple repairs were hastily done, using cheap, flimsy materials (like wood and mortar), writes Niels Gutschow, an expert on urban history and temple conservation in Nepal, via email.

An obvious problem when it comes to reinforcing Nepal's monuments is that the country lacks resources. Once the immediate human suffering and damage has been contained, Nepal might need the help of international conservation organizations to rebuild its cultural and historical landmarks—including its temples—which are the heart and soul of the country's identity, Gutschow says.

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. A cyclist rides on the bike lane in the Mid Market neighborhood during Bike to Work Day in San Francisco,
    Perspective

    Why We Need to Dream Bigger Than Bike Lanes

    In the 1930s big auto dreamed up freeways and demanded massive car infrastructure. Micromobility needs its own Futurama—one where cars are marginalized.

  2. a photo of the Maryland Renaissance Festival
    Life

    The Utopian Vision That Explains Renaissance Fairs

    What’s behind the enduring popularity of all these medieval-themed living-history festivals?

  3. Maps

    A Comprehensive Map of American Lynchings

    The practice wasn’t limited to the South, as this new visualization of racial violence in the Jim Crow era proves.

  4. a photo of a WeWork office building
    Life

    What WeWork’s Demise Could Do to NYC Real Estate

    The troubled coworking company is the largest office tenant in New York City. What happens to the city’s commercial real estate market if it goes under?

  5. Design

    The New MoMA Is Bigger, More Diverse, and More Open to the City

    The renovated and expanded Museum of Modern Art looks to connect the museum to New York City while telling a fuller story about modernism.

×