Travelers inspect the departures board at Penn Station on in July 2015. AP Photo/Mary Altaffer

Metro New York is being held hostage by political vanity, and the region’s economic health is at stake.

In January 2011, Senator Chuck Schumer warned that disinvestment in rail infrastructure between New York and New Jersey could cause a decline in the region’s economic viability. That was shortly after New Jersey Governor Chris Christie single-handedly shut down construction of an $8.7 billion federal project to build two new tunnels across the river, citing concerns about his state’s liability for cost overruns. Schumer, speaking at a Crain’s forum, said Christie’s move would have long-term repercussions:

“Historians may well look back at this decision—to put a stop to the largest transit project in the country—as a turning point, as a moment that the region, and the nation, stopped looking towards the future.”

The project Christie killed—loudly proclaiming his fiscal responsibility to a receptive conservative audience—would have been the biggest public-works endeavor in the nation at the time, modernizing and adding capacity to an outdated and overburdened Hudson River rail crossing where Amtrak and New Jersey Transit trains compete for track time while carrying 160,000 passengers each day. Flooding from Superstorm Sandy in 2012 accelerated the forces of entropy,and Amtrak has said it will have to shut down tunnels in and out of Manhattan one at a time for repairs.

Fast-forward to July 2015. During one hot and humid week, travelers trying to get between New Jersey and New York by rail found themselves mired in four consecutive days of commuter hell, as power and signaling systems on the busy corridor failed over and over again. Not quite an apocalypse, perhaps, but an alarming affirmation of doomsayer predictions nonetheless.

For the Hudson River rail crossing, it seems, the dystopian future is now. The existing rail tunnels are a fragile chokepoint whose failure could asphyxiate the entire Northeast rail corridor—all the way from Boston to Washington, D.C.and, by extension, further strain the already nightmarish roads in the metro New York region.

In testimony before the New Jersey State Senate this week, a top Amtrak official warned that the recent infrastructure failures “could become the norm.” According to NJ.com, Amtrak Executive Vice President Stephen Gardner said the antiquated tunnels, tracks, and electrical systems that carry millions across the Hudson each year are in need of $4 billion in annual investment over several years to get to modern functionality. Total costs for the project would be at least $14 billion and could exceed $20 billion, according to some estimates.

Stranded commuters might have felt a sense of urgency about figuring out how to get those investments made, as commutes that usually run under 30 minutes stretched to three hours. For many elected officials in the region, however, investing in political posturing remains a top priority.

Neither New York nor New Jersey wants to end up shouldering too much of the cost, and this time it has been New York’s governor, Andrew Cuomo, who has been most vocal in protecting his home state’s coffers, insisting that the federal government provide grants and not loans to fund the project. He has been cold to entreaties from U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx for a meeting on the matter.

“It’s not my tunnel!" Cuomo said at a press conference Monday. "Why don’t you pay for it? It’s not my tunnel. It is an Amtrak tunnel that is used by Amtrak and by New Jersey Transit." (As other observers have pointed out, Cuomo has been willing to take on debt to build one of his pet transportation projects, a replacement for the Tappan Zee Bridge over the Hudson that serves many fewer commuters, but connects New York to New York rather than to New Jersey.)

In the latest round of negotiations, Senator Schumer has again tried to take the high ground, calling on Tuesday for the creation of a new nonprofit corporation that would coordinate financing for the most recent proposal to improve the rail connections, known as the Gateway project. He warned of a coming “transportation Armageddon” if the region’s leaders can’t get it together to agree on a plan.

A map of Amtrak’s proposed Gateway Project to improve rail service over the Hudson. (Amtrak)

Cuomo later softened his stance, saying in a statement that he welcomed Schumer’s proposals. “We both agree that [this] will require significant federal investment,” Cuomo said, “and I look forward to working with him to move this critical project forward.”

In his 2011 speech, Schumer noted that the New York-New Jersey-Connecticut region’s public transportation infrastructure makes it uniquely qualified among American metropolitan areas to compete on the global economic stage:

It has been one of the particular geniuses of New York going back centuries that we have always recognized the importance of investing in infrastructure, even when others did not. ...

Public transportation is what separates the New York region from almost every other American city and surrounding suburbs. That we can move so many people in and out of such a dense environment is essential, and one of the reasons that, even today, New York is the largest metropolitan region in this country, with 5 million more people than live in and around Los Angeles. ….

[M]any experts would tell you the interconnections that having so many people in one place gives rise to is one of the reasons that we have become a dominant financial center, a dominant media center, and now, increasingly, a dominant high-tech center. The density that mass transit facilitates will only become more important as we move further into the 21st Century information age.

He was right about all of that. And that’s why the people of the region, and the nation, are so ill-served by the political squabbling that continues to push a solution to the Hudson River crossing into the distant future. For Cuomo to say “It’s not my tunnel” is a patent absurdity. New York does not exist in a vacuum, any more than New Jersey does. The two states should be allies, rather than antagonists.

Yet our system allows a regional transportation solution to be manipulated by state politicians with their own agendas and narrow-minded competing interests. Rail commuters in the Northeast have been held hostage to Christie’s ambition and Cuomo’s vanity. The health of a whole region’s economy is in danger. It’s time to find another way forward.

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. Equity

    Elizabeth Warren’s Ambitious Fix for America’s Housing Crisis

    The Massachusetts Democrat introduced legislation that takes aim at segregation, redlining, restrictive zoning, and the loss of equity by low-income homeowners.

  2. Transportation

    Like Uber, but for Cartographers

    Streetcred, a blockchain-powered open-source mapping startup, will pay you to map. (And then give the data away for free.)

  3. Transportation

    Why Did America Give Up on Mass Transit? (Don't Blame Cars.)

    Streetcar, bus, and metro systems have been ignoring one lesson for 100 years: Service drives demand.

  4. Passengers wait in a German subway station
    Transportation

    The Global Mass Transit Revolution

    A new report confirms that the U.S. lags behind the rest of the world in mass transit.

  5. Portrait of a bearded man at a building site.
    Design

    After Maria, an ‘Earthship’ Rises in Puerto Rico

    In western Puerto Rico, families and volunteers are building a low-tech, resilient haven out of earth, tires, and trash.