North Carolina lawmakers gather for special session to address Charlotte's LGBT-friendly ordinance. AP Photo/Gerry Broome

State lawmakers hurriedly pushed through a bill that jeopardizes LGBT citizens—and the rights of cities to govern themselves.

The North Carolina legislature convened a hurried “emergency” session Wednesday, where they passed a bill that strips all its city and local governments of the power to enforce existing laws that protect LGBT residents from discrimination, allow transgender individuals access to bathrooms that correspond with their gender identity, or allow employers to pay wages above the state minimum. The bill, which Governor Pat Mcrory signed into law late Wednesday, deals a huge blow not just to the state’s LGBT and low-income residents, but to its cities’ freedom to decide what’s best for them.

“This is perhaps the most extreme anti-LGBT measure we’ve seen anywhere in the country,” Mike Meno, communications director at the American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina told CityLab. “It combines a lot of bad ideas into one ... uniquely offensive bill.”

The state hits back at Charlotte

Wednesday’s session was a direct response to the city of Charlotte’s extension of its non-discrimination ordinance in February. The ordinance, which won 7-2 in the city council, prohibits businesses from discriminating against customers on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity, and requires that transgender people be allowed to enter public bathrooms they feel comfortable using.

Following that decision, conservatives in the state legislature were up in arms—particularly about the bathroom provision. They immediately threatened to strike it down, citing safety and privacy concerns, as opponents of such provisions often do. Here is North Carolina Governor Pat McCrory, via Buzzfeed News:

“As I communicated and predicted prior to the vote, state legislative leaders have notified me about introducing legislation that would correct this misguided government regulation and ensure it will not happen in any town or city in North Carolina,” McCrory said.

That “correction”came Wednesday—and all within a matter of a few hours. By 3:30 p.m., HB 2 had passed in the House (supported by Republicans and Democrats):

By 6:30 p.m., it had passed in the Senate unanimously after Democrats staged a walk-out:

And late in the evening, the governor signed the bill:

Senator Jeff Jackson, a Democrat, summarized the entire process in a Facebook post:

Here's what's happening - at light speed - in the General Assembly's "emergency" session right now.

In response to Charlotte's anti-discrimination ordinance, a bill has been introduced that would eliminate every anti-discrimination ordinance *in the state* and remove any negative consequences for those who violate the state's ban on racial and gender discrimination.

They are pushing this through as fast as possible. No one was allowed to see the bill until the committee met, then legislators were given 5 minutes to read it. It passed out of the committee and is now being debated on the House floor. It will almost certainly pass the House. Then it will be taken up in Senate committee, then to the Senate floor. All in one day.

If it becomes law, it means any business in the state can refuse service to any LGBT person - even by just posting a sign that says, "No Gays Allowed." It is much broader than last year's much-debated Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), which at least required a "sincerely held religious belief" to refuse service. This includes no such requirement. Discriminate at will.

The press is just now waking up to the bait and switch that just occurred, which is why you haven't heard much about this yet - but you will. This is going to be the broadest anti-LGBT legislation in the nation, and it will hurt our state deeply if it becomes law. ‪#‎WeAreNotThis‬

What the law does

It hurts gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender North Carolinians who patronize bars, restaurants, and other businesses because it wipes out any city laws, like those in Charlotte, protecting them from discrimination. It also infringes on city employment protections currently in place: There may now be no legal recourse for workers fired for being gay. Nowhere in the state will transgender people be lawfully allowed to use the public restroom of their choice, putting citizens in danger of being harassed and even physically attacked. Those rights are now nullified, despite little evidence that non-discrimination laws like Charlotte’s would negatively affected anyone. Here’s how one North Carolinian transgender woman reacted when the bill passed, again via WRAL:

"I can't use the men's room. I won't go back to the men's room. It is unsafe for me there. People like me die there," said Madeleine Goss, a Raleigh woman who said she was bullied as a boy in Hickory because of her gender identity.

This law’s passage has other, broader repercussions for the state. For one, it can potentially cost the state $4.5 billion in federal funding for schools under the federal Title IX amendment, which prohibits discrimination in public education institutions, including against transgender students, the ACLU says.

Cities will not be permitted to raise their wages locally, hurting low-income workers living in big cities where their labor is most needed, in industries like construction and banking. Several major companies have come out in opposition of the bill, saying that it would damage business in the state:

The North Carolina League of Municipalities is also not a fan of the bill, because at its core it impinges on the rights of local governments to do what they’re supposed to do—govern:

Most importantly, by passing this broad, sweeping bill in the way state lawmakers did, North Carolina’s state legislature continues to chip away at democracy in the state.

The ACLU, Lambda Legal, and Equality North Carolina have announced that they will be “exploring legal challenges to the discriminatory law.”

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. Equity

    What the New Urban Anchors Owe Their Cities

    Corporations like Google and Amazon reap the spoils of winner-take-all urbanism. Here’s how they can also bear greater responsibility.

  2. A prospective buyer looks at a rendering of a new apartment complex in Seoul in 2005.
    Design

    Why Koreans Shun the Suburbs

    In cities around the world, harried urbanites look to the suburbs for more space or a nicer house for their money. But in South Korea, the city apartment is still the dream.

  3. A LimeBike is pictured next to a Capital Bikeshare dock.
    Transportation

    Bike Share, Unplanned

    Three private bike-share companies are determined to shake up the streets of D.C. But what, exactly, are they trying to disrupt?

  4. Rescue crews and observers on top of the rubble from a collapsed building that fell in the Condesa neighborhood of Mexico City.
    Environment

    A Brigade of Architects and Engineers Rushed to Assess Earthquake Damage in Mexico City

    La Casa del Arquitecto became the headquarters for highly skilled urbanists looking to help and determine why some buildings suffered more spectacularly than others.

  5. Transportation

    Why Are Little Kids in Japan So Independent?

    In Japan, small children take the subway and run errands alone, no parent in sight. The reason why has more to do with social trust than self-reliance.