Justice

The Supreme Court Just Made It Even Harder to Sue Your Employer

Corporations love mandatory arbitration clauses, which limit the rights of workers to take their employers to court. If limits on them are struck down, employees have other options.
Spring arrives at the U.S. Supreme Court. It could come soon for plaintiffs in forced arbitration agreements.Yuri Gripas/Reuters

When Gretchen Carlson, the former host of “Fox & Friends,” accused Fox News CEO Roger Ailes of sexual harassment, she wasn’t legally able to sue Fox News. A mandatory arbitration clause that she signed in her contract with the company prohibited her from taking her employer to court. The agreement required her to negotiate her complaint in confidential proceedings. So instead she sued Ailes personally—for $20 million.

Of all the hidden legal craft tucked into the fine print today, forced arbitration agreements may do the greatest harm to the largest number of Americans. These binding clauses, buried deep in the arcana of terms-of-service documents and employment contracts, lock millions of workers and consumers out of the courtroom.