To understand and compare modern metropolises, city borders just don't cut it.

The edges of a city's defined borders don't really mean all that much when they bleed into yet more urbanity. The stereotype of sprawling Greater Los Angeles, for example, shows hardly any discernible distinction when crossing over the border from Los Angeles proper to neighboring Inglewood or El Segundo or Long Beach.

So when the city is more than a single city – a metropolis – how do we compare one city or urban agglomeration to the next? For now, we do it very imprecisely, by say, comparing the distinctly dense Hong Kong with radiating London. But a new set of metropolitan definitions is hoping to make city-to-city comparison a lot more sensible in an age of urban agglomerations indifferent to borderlines.

A report from the OECD proposes a new way of looking at and comparing the world's urban areas by crafting a formalized approach to defining them. In "Redefining 'Urban': A New Way to Measure Metropolitan Areas," authors Monica Brezzi, Mario Piacentrini, Konstantin Rosina, Daniel Sanchez-Serra propose the concept of "functional urban areas" that are based on population density and travel-to-work flows. Basically, it's a measurement of population and interconnected economies.

Using satellite data, the researchers identify "urban high-density clusters" where the population density is at least 1,500 people per square kilometer (or 1,000 people per square kilometer in the U.S. and Canada). They create an "urban core" by outlining the shape formed by all the contiguous urban high-density clusters, filtering out some clusters that don't meet certain population thresholds that, again, vary by the region. Finally, the core is further refined by the inclusion of any municipalities where more than half of the population lives within the urban core. This set of images explains:

Source: OECD

But not all urban areas have this simple single-core structure. For polycentric urban groupings, the researchers identify interconnected cores as those with more than 15 percent of commuters traveling between each other. The researchers also define the hinterlands as places where more than 15 percent of commuters travel to an urban core from a non-core area.

The figure below shows the "functional urban areas" of Rome and Paris, with the urban core in dark blue and the hinterlands in light blue.

Source: OECD

The authors of this report argue that their definitions could help to create a standardized concept of urban areas as economic units. They've already applied this methodology to each city in 28 OECD countries with a population greater than 50,000, totaling more than 1,100 cities.

"An internationally recognized definition of urban areas as functional economic units can better guide the way city governments plan infrastructure, transportation, housing and schools, space for culture and recreation," the authors write.

Top image: OECD

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. Environment

    Let's All Swim in the Once-Filthy Canals of Paris

    Unlike many cities, the French capital has made good on its promise to re-open urban waterways to bathers. How did they do it?  

  2. Transportation

    Do Driverless Cars Need Their Own Roads Around Manhattan?

    A concept for AV expressways promises to reduce travel times, but falls into an old trap of car-centric planning.

  3. The Salk Institute, near San Diego
    Design

    This Is Your Brain on Architecture

    In her new book, Sarah Williams Goldhagen presents scientific evidence for why some buildings delight us and others—too many of them—disappoint.

  4. Equity

    Trump to the Rust Belt: Move Somewhere Else

    The president told upstate New Yorkers to move to a red state with jobs, even as his planned budget cuts promise to make their lives more difficult.

  5. Equity

    Why Jimmy Carter Believes Housing Is a Basic Human Right

    Richard Florida talks to the former president about housing, Habitat for Humanity, and how government assistance enabled their current success.