Associated Press

U.S. workers: Cheap to hire, easy to fire.

Yesterday’s pleasant surprise: The U.S. economy grew much faster than we thought in the previous quarter: 2.5 percent on the year, thanks to robust exports.

Another pleasant surprise: That might continue. America’s great manufacturing renaissance continues to attract converts. Companies including Toyota, Honda, Siemens and Rolls Royce have all shifted production to the U.S. in recent years. Boston Consulting Group, which advises companies on their supply chains, recently made an extended case that the United States is like the China of wealthy countries (awesome analogy!) because of how cheap it is to make stuff there.

Here’s BCG’s chart. What it shows is that labor and energy costs are a lot lower in the U.S. than in Europe and Japan, and are no higher, combined, than in China. Overall, in 2015, manufacturing in the U.S. will cost only about 5 percent more than in China.
 
American_Export_Surge_Ex1_lg_tcm80-141741

Even if you doubt the bit about China, the notion that the U.S. will comfortably beat out Europe and Japan makes sense. It has a more flexible labor market, and cheaper energy and plastics thanks to the oil fracking boom. The U.S. also has the transit efficiencies that come with location. It costs more than twice as much to ship a container to Rotterdam from Yokohama as from New York City. And while shipping from the U.S. west coast to Asia is comparably priced to shipping from Europe, it’s faster—and almost as cheap as shipping from Japan to China!

The end result, according to the consultants, is that the U.S. could capture $25 to $72 billion in exports from the four European countries and Japan, creating as many as 1.2 million factory jobs.

That’s quite a claim, considering that in the last three years of the manufacturing rebound, fewer than half a million new jobs have been created—and that hiring has slowed considerably. There are many reasons to be skeptical that manufacturing will expand greatly in the US, starting with the fact that its cheap gas is just as big a boon to factories across the border in Mexico.

But maybe the biggest problem for American manufacturing is that its greatest strength is also a weakness. The report notes that a significant reason for lower U.S. labor costs is that it’s easier to fire people and shut down factories:

In Germany, for example, we estimate government-mandated costs of approximately $8 million to shutter an average, 200-worker plant and more than $40 million to close a 1,000-worker plant. These costs are associated with the need to comply with rules governing severance pay and the advance notice that must be given to long-term employees. However, the actual cost of shutting a German factory can be significantly higher. German law mandates that workers may remain on the job, at full pay, for anywhere from a few months to more than a year, depending on how long they have been employed by the company, while layoff terms are being negotiated and after notification of a layoff has been received. Specific union contracts, asset write-downs, requirements to retrain workers, and other factors can also add to exit costs.

When these consultants advise companies about where to open factories, they also take into account what happens if the factories need to be closed. That may make the U.S. an attractive spot for multinationals, but economies that live by cheap labor costs can die by them, too.

This post originally appeared on Quartz, an Atlantic partner site.

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. A sign outside a storefront in Buffalo, New York.
    Environment

    Will Buffalo Become a Climate Change Haven?

    The Western New York city possesses a distinct mix of weather, geography, and infrastructure that could make it a potential climate haven. But for whom?

  2. photo: A vacant home in Oakland that is about to demolished for an apartment complex.
    Equity

    Fix California's Housing Crisis, Activists Say. But Which One?

    As a controversy over unoccupied homes in the Bay Area and Los Angeles reveals, advocates disagree about what kind of housing should be built, and where.

  3. photo: a high-speed train in Switzerland
    Transportation

    The Case for Portland-to-Vancouver High-Speed Rail

    At the Cascadia Rail Summit outside Seattle, a fledgling scheme to bring high-speed rail from Portland to Vancouver found an enthusiastic reception.

  4. A syringe sits on top of a car. Houses are behind it.
    Life

    The Changing Geography of the Opioid Crisis

    A new study shows that the country faces different opioid challenges in urban and rural areas.

  5. photo: Agriculture Secretary Sonny Purdue
    Equity

    What the USDA’s New Food Stamp Rule Will Do

    By tightening food stamp work requirements, the Trump administration limits states’ ability to aid high-unemployment areas. And more regulations are coming.

×