Joakin Formo / Flickr

In challenging local regulations, the ride service has gone too far in undermining public safety.

Amid the horror of the ongoing hostage situation in Sydney's central business district, somehow the ride service Uber has managed to add itself to the list of bad guys. As demand to leave the city center increased during the early hours of the crisis, so too did Uber fares, in line with the company's surge pricing policy—eventually reaching a minimum of $100, according to Mashable. In response to some pushback, Uber offered this incredibly thoughtless explanation:

That led to a predictable onslaught of much-deserved criticism that hasn't let up, with some Twitter users calling this the last straw:

Ultimately Uber did address the problem, offering free rides to anyone in Sydney and refunds to users who were harmed by the price surge. (The company also pointed out that the surge went into effect automatically.) But the incident is just the latest in a rapidly lengthening line of PR disasters for Uber: in recent weeks, the company has shown a flagrant willingness to invade rider privacy and been taken to court by Los Angeles and San Francisco for misleading the public.

There's a theme to these problems, and it's centered around public safety. Uber's original goal of disrupting the highly regulated taxi industry might make a lot of sense to economists seeking more market competition. But local regulations do more than write the rules for supply and demand; they're also there to protect the public interest, and it's in this area where Uber has been equally disruptive, in a negative way.

Take, for instance, one of the charges leveled at Uber in the recent lawsuit by San Francisco. Uber says it uses a driver background check "often more rigorous than what is required to become a taxi driver." (This, of course, has been proven definitely not to be the case for Uber in India).  But the S.F. lawsuit contends that Uber actually uses a check system that's far less reliable than the industry standard—one that doesn't require fingerprinting connected to criminal databases, which makes it much easier for a potential driver to falsify an identity.

And the allegations get worse. In addition to making its dubious claim about having better driver background checks, Uber fought heavily against a California bill that would have required the company to use the very same fingerprinting technology required for official city taxis. From the lawsuit:

At the same time Uber was stating that it is "working diligently to ensure we're doing everything we can to make Uber the safest experience on the road," it was instead working diligently to ensure it was doing everything it could to successfully defeat a bill pending in the California legislature that would have actually made Uber safer for its customers and the public.

A number of media accounts noted in the lawsuit corroborate these charges of poor driver oversight. Yes, such examples are anecdotal, but the point is that Uber's apparent quest to expose unfavorable market regulations often smacks of little more than merely wanting to ensure favorable Uber regulations. In challenging the rules that might have limited consumer options, Uber also seems to be undermining the rules that protect consumer welfare.

The Sydney incident should only encourage local officials to press back against Uber when it comes to public safety. (Indeed, in late November, a New York politician reportedly proposed a new law that would cap Uber's surge pricing at 100 percent of the fare, instead of 900 percent.) It's also a reminder that the window of opportunity in the mobility market remains very open for the taking: Uber's technology advantage is quite small at the moment, and its social deficit is widening by the day.

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. A photo of a visitor posing for a photo with Elvis in downtown Nashville
    Perspective

    Cities: Don’t Fall in the Branding Trap

    From Instagram stunts to Edison bulbs, why do so many cities’ marketing plans try to convince people that they’re exactly like somewhere else?

  2. Amazon HQ2

    Without Amazon HQ2, What Happens to Housing in Queens?

    The arrival of the tech company’s new headquarters was set to shake up the borough’s real estate market, driving up rents and spurring displacement. Now what?

  3. Transportation

    You Can’t Design Bike-Friendly Cities Without Considering Race and Class

    Bike equity is a powerful tool for reducing inequality. Too often, cycling infrastructure is tailored only to wealthy white cyclists.

  4. a photo of a used needle in a park in Lawrence, Massachusetts.
    Equity

    Why the Rural Opioid Crisis Is Different From the Urban One

    As deaths from heroin, fentanyl, and prescription opioids soar in the U.S., a new study looks at the geographic factors driving the drug overdose epidemic.

  5. Equity

    The FBI's Forgotten War on Black-Owned Bookstores

    At the height of the Black Power movement, the Bureau focused on the unlikeliest of public enemies: black independent booksellers.