You should probably email a teenager on a weekday morning, a new study suggests.

In 2013, 183 billion emails were sent every day, according to the technology-research firm Radicati. The firm predicts that by 2017, it will be nearly 207 billion. This is a gold mine of information for communications research, but an overwhelmingly daunting one. Attempting to analyze all of it would be like Scrooge McDuck diving into an ocean of gold, and then drowning in it.

But as an email becomes an increasingly integral part of the puzzle of human communication, understanding how people use it becomes more important as well. And a new study, the largest study of email yet, manages to bottle and measure a pretty big portion of that gold ocean.

Researchers from Yahoo Labs and the University of Southern California Information Sciences Institute analyzed 187 million emails sent between 2 million unique users to see how long it took people to reply, how long their replies were, and how that changed depending on factors like time of day and who was doing the emailing. (Caveat: They were all sent using Yahoo Mail.)

The researchers only included messages sent from one person to one other, no group emails. And to eliminate the possibility of including bots or spam, they only looked at email threads between people who emailed each other at least five times during the course of the study, which lasted “several months.” (The paper doesn’t specify exactly how many.)

With that in mind, the results of the study indicate that if you are a real person, emailing one other real person whom you know, chances are you’ll get a response within the same day. In the study, this was the case 90 percent of the time. Half the replies came within 47 minutes, and the most likely response time was two minutes.

But they’re not going to write you a novel. Half the replies are under 43 words, and the most common length was just five words long. Also, the faster you get your reply, the shorter it’s likely to be. With a weird exception—once emails get longer than 200 words, they take slightly less time to write, possibly because people who are that verbose in emails are more likely to be comfortable writers. These people may also be writing the 30 percent of emails that were 100 words or longer.

Emailing also seems to follow its own sort of circadian rhythm, waxing and waning pretty much in time with the standard work-week. Weekday emails get longer and faster responses than those received on the weekend, and emails sent at night take longer to get responses than those sent during the day. People also send longer responses to morning emails than afternoon or evening emails.

Maybe that’s because if you catch them in the morning, your email is just a single snowball rolling down the mountainside, one that can be easily caught and tossed back. As the day goes on, all the snowballs become an avalanche and the best someone can do is dig a little pocket of air to breathe in. As people’s “email load” gets higher, the study found, they respond to more emails, more quickly, with shorter messages. But it’s often not enough to keep up.

“As the email load increases, users reply to a smaller fraction of their emails, from about 25 percent of all emails received in a day at low load to less than 5 percent of emails at high load (about 100 emails a day),” the study reads.

As might be expected, there are generational differences in how people deal with this digital deluge. In general, teens send the fastest, shortest messages—their fingers are nimble and their brains attuned to the medium. It takes them 13 minutes on average to reply to an email. Young adults (20 to 35 years old) take 16 minutes on average, adults (36 to 50) take 24 minutes, and people 51 and older take 47 minutes. The teens of course are unfazed by email load, and respond to the same fraction of messages no matter how many they get. The older people get, the less they seem able to deal with the mounting pile of little demands on their time, which I’m having trouble not seeing as a metaphor.

Anyway, if you want a response to your email as fast as possible, send it to a teen in the morning on a weekday! Or don’t—they need to focus on homeroom.

Top image: JuJik/Shutterstock.com.

This post originally appeared on The Atlantic.

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. A woman sits inside her store as man walks past a message displayed on a building, reading "0 shots, 0 killed today, in Chicago".

    Forget Broken Windows: Think 'Busy Streets'

    This theory suggests neighborhoods can fight crime by getting locals to clean up and maintain their own public spaces.

  2. Murals depicting David Bowie and Bernie Sanders in the Silver Lake neighborhood of Los Angeles

    Do Art Scenes Really Lead to Gentrification?

    A new study finds that arts establishments are actually more concentrated in affluent and gentrified—rather than gentrifying—neighborhoods.

  3. Abandoned homes in East Cleveland, where a land conservancy has been working to acquire vacant properties.

    Land Conservancies Enter Unfamiliar Territory: the City

    Some eco-minded groups that traditionally focus on rural conservation are turning their attention to urban areas, in an effort to combat inequality and sprawl.

  4. A young refugee from Kosovo stands in front of a map of Hungary with her teacher.

    Who Maps the World?

    Too often, men. And money. But a team of OpenStreetMap users is working to draw new cartographic lines, making maps that more accurately—and equitably—reflect our space.

  5. POV

    The Gateway Project Doesn't Need Trump's Approval

    The $30 billion rail tunnel project may be a victim of President Trump’s feud with Democrats. But New York and New Jersey could still save it.