Protestors hold up photos of undocumented immigrants ineligible for college tuition aide in New York. AP Photo/Mike Groll

A comprehensive reform bill could generate $2.2 billion in local tax revenue.

After being elected Speaker of the House, Paul Ryan made it pretty clear that he was unwilling to work with the White House on immigration reform. According to the Wisconsin Republican, President Obama was “circumventing the legislative process” through his 2014 executive action that aimed to put millions of unauthorized immigrants on the path to legal citizenship. (The actions is currently languishing in court.)

“I think it would be a ridiculous notion to try and work on an issue like this with a president we simply cannot trust on this issue,” He said in an interview on CBS’s Face the Nation. “So, that is not in the cards.”

Never mind that similar executive actions on immigration have been enacted by both Democrat and Republican Presidents in the past. Delays in addressing the country’s broken immigration system, have negative economic consequences, too. According to a new report released by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, federal and state policies that allow unauthorized immigrants to live and work in the country, and that help improve their earning potential, can significantly raise their contributions to state and local tax revenue.

“They work, pay many taxes — in fact, they pay a larger share of their income in state and local taxes than the top 1 percent of taxpayers do — and buy goods and services from businesses across a state,” the authors write in the report.

President Obama’s 2014 executive action would expand the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program that allows those who came to America as children to legally stay and work in the country. It also would aim to shield undocumented parents of U.S.-born children from deportation. The order would generate an estimate another $845 million in state and local taxes—on top of the $12 billion that undocumented immigrants already pay, as per a 2012 revenue analysis cited by the report (chart on left). A more comprehensive bill—such as this 2013 senate bill that proposed a citizenship pipeline for most undocumented workers—might mean a $2.2 billion increase in revenue.

While the legal system sorts out Obama’s executive order, comprehensive reform might not see the light of day until the next President takes office. Nevertheless, state- and city-level policies that protect unauthorized immigrants from wage theft, allow them to apply for driver’s licenses, and help them access higher education, can help improve their earnings, and therefore lead to greater local and state tax revenue.

Here’s how the CBPP report sums it up:

Rather than pursue immigration enforcement measures that are better left to the federal government, such as mandating immigration status checks during law enforcement stops, states should look to policies that better integrate immigrants into the mainstream economy.

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. Transportation

    You Can’t Design Bike-Friendly Cities Without Considering Race and Class

    Bike equity is a powerful tool for reducing inequality. Too often, cycling infrastructure is tailored only to wealthy white cyclists.

  2. Design

    A History of the American Public Library

    A visual exploration of how a critical piece of social infrastructure came to be.

  3. Multi-colored maps of Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Tampa, denoting neighborhood fragmentation
    Equity

    Urban Neighborhoods, Once Distinct by Race and Class, Are Blurring

    Yet in cities, affluent white neighborhoods and high-poverty black ones are outliers, resisting the fragmentation shown with other types of neighborhoods.

  4. Equity

    Capturing Black Bottom, a Detroit Neighborhood Lost to Urban Renewal

    “Black Bottom Street View,” now exhibiting at the Detroit Public Library, thoughtfully displays old images of the historic African American neighborhood in its final days.

  5. Life

    The Town Where Retirees Can’t Retire

    In fast-aging pockets of rural America, older residents are going back to work. But not always because they need the money.