Splitting a bill on the basis of income disparities won’t solve sticky cultural problems—but it might remind people that they haven’t gone away.

Settling on how to split a restaurant bill is a sticky situation for groups of diners. Should you itemize it? Should you split it down the middle? Should you just stay home forever and absolve yourself of these awkward discussions? A torrent of contradictory advice gives etiquette experts conniptions.

A new app, set to launch for iOS this month, claims to offer a new solution to this interminable debate—but really, in this case, the bill isn’t the point at all.

EquiTable uses the headache-inducing occasion of splitting a check as a way to broach discussions about inequality on the basis of gender and race. It draws upon data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to apportion responsibility commensurate with guests’ average earning potential. So, a white guy out to dinner with a black woman would fork over more money to cover the check, as a product of the enduring wage gap.

The app splits bills based on demographics. (EquiTable)

The app doesn’t account for how much the people at the table are making in their respective jobs—instead, it weighs the burdens of their demographic groups as a whole. “You can’t detract our current social and political systems from how labor markets have treated groups of people historically,” says Graham Starr, a writer who worked on the app. (Full disclosure: he’s now a fellow at The Atlantic, though we haven’t met.)

The app is tongue-in-cheek, for sure—white diners can contest their privilege by claiming exemptions on the basis of ugliness or the indignity of growing up as a middle child. It’s deliberately funny, and, in fact, was conceived at Comedy Hack Day, which describes itself as an incubator for “hilarious tech.” EquiTable is the brainchild of Luna Malbroux, who works as an anti-bias educator in San Francisco, and was brought to life by a team of seven comedians, designers, and programmers.

But the team is quick to point out that its satirical bent doesn’t prevent the app from tackling a real issue—in fact, the cheekiness is a deliberate tactic to make an often-uncomfortable topic a little more palatable. “I thought a bill-splitting app would be a fun way to show how inequality plays into people’s lives economically,” Malbroux explains. The goal is to use everyday interactions as an entry point for tackling big-issue discussions. “We’re not making fun of the problem—we’re worried that people aren’t seeing the problem,” says Starr. The app is usable—that is to say, it does function as a bill-splitter—but it’s more potent as a thought experiment.

Of course, the app won’t shrink the wage gap. But it might remind people that it exists. That’s because comedy and satire can disarm taboo topics, and, in the process, cultivate empathy and awareness, Starr explains. “It’s silly, it’s funny, but it’s still real.”

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. A young refugee from Kosovo stands in front of a map of Hungary with her teacher.

    Who Maps the World?

    Too often, men. And money. But a team of OpenStreetMap users is working to draw new cartographic lines, making maps that more accurately—and equitably—reflect our space.

  2. A woman at a homeless encampment in Anaheim, California

    The Unhappy States of America

    Even with the economy humming, Americans are feeling more anxious, depressed, and dissatisfied with their lives than they did in 2009.

  3. Equity

    The Austin Bombings Were Terrifying. But Were They 'Terrorism'?

    Absent a motive, the serial bombing attacks in Texas hadn’t been labeled with the term. Now, police say the suspect has been killed.

  4. POV

    The Gateway Project Doesn't Need Trump's Approval

    The $30 billion rail tunnel project may be a victim of President Trump’s feud with Democrats. But New York and New Jersey could still save it.

  5. A self-driving Volvo SUV in Scottsdale, Arizona. The company has halted testing of its autonomous vehicle program in the wake of a fatal crash on Sunday.

    How the Self-Driving Dream Might Become a Nightmare

    What will happen if we just accept that a certain number of pedestrian deaths are an inevitable part of adopting autonomous vehicles?