A biweekly tour of the ever-expanding cartographic landscape.

Welcome to the latest edition of MapLab. Sign up to receive this newsletter in your inbox here.


Stock your bunkers: On April 6, a so-called “mini Y2K” is coming for GPS. The global positioning system operated by the U.S. government enters its third “epoch” on Saturday, entailing a numerical reset that could screw with older navigation devices.

Huh? Let’s back up. Your friend GPS—the infrastructure that pinpoints smartphones, cars, and watches, plus scientific instruments, banking systems, and electrical grids—is calibrated in large part based on time. Satellites beam signals down to earthly receivers, which capture the gap between the time of transmission and arrival. Quantifying that lag helps align the position of one receiver relative to others.

Without the correct timestamp, GPS instruments might get confused. (Giphy)

All of these times are measured based on a point in a sequence of numbers. Originally, the way GPS devices encoded the week was in a limited, 10-bit field. That meant that no more than 1,024 weeks (just under 20 years) could be handled by a receiver, periods that are known as GPS “epochs.” The first began on January 6, 1980, and the third begins on Saturday, which is when some older GPS devices would reset to week “0.” Eventually, they could start spitting out inaccurate timestamps. According to a slide deck about the epochal rollover by the U.S. Naval Observatory, “each nanosecond of relative satellite clock synchronization error can add one foot of ranging error.”

What does that mean for you? The GPS receivers embedded in most everyday consumer devices aren’t likely to be affected, since many newer devices use a 13-bit field that can handle much longer epochs. And a lot of GPS software can be updated remotely by manufacturers to weather the turnover. (In-vehicle navigation bigwigs Garmin and TomTom are confident that their customers won’t be affected, as they’ve already rolled out fixes.)

Zoom in, zoom out. (Giphy)

But the last epochal change did result in data failures, in many cases long after the 1999 pivot. Motorola, Novatel, and the USNO experienced breakdowns in some of their older receivers related to this problem in recent years, and it’s possible that this week’s turnover will produce more.

Scientists—everyone from seismologists to particle physicists—are girding for glitches too, Nature reported this week. Universities and consortiums are busily updating software systems, but some harder-to-replace instruments will inevitably fritz out, generating bad data that’ll take tedious effort to correct, just like in 1999. “We will still be on the edge of our seat during the rollover,” Brian Donahue, a senior geodetic engineer at Natural Resources Canada in Ottowa, told Nature.

For most of us, the great GPS reset won’t be the end of the world as we know it, much like Y2K. But it is a glimpse into the surprisingly fragile (and analog!) foundations of our very digital world.  


Audits hit the Black Belt

Just in time for tax season, here’s a grim picture of where and on whom the IRS performs the bulk of its audits. Drawing data from a report by former IRS economist Kim M. Bloomquist, new maps by ProPublica show that counties in the heavily African-American U.S. South, from Mississippi to Georgia, experience a much higher rate of auditing intensity than, say, the whiter upper Midwest and Northeast.

(ProPublica)

CityLab’s Brentin Mock reports on the maps:

The 10 counties with the highest IRS audit intensity are all found in the Black Belt, eight of them in Mississippi alone. Baker County’s 9.2 audit rate pales in comparison to Humphrey County, Mississippi, where the rate is about 11.8 audits per 1,000 filings. The Northeast region of the U.S. meanwhile appears to be largely protected from the IRS’s fine-tooth combs, despite the larger volume of wealthy households in that area.

Read more and interact: “Where in The U.S. Are You Most Likely to Be Audited by the IRS?” (ProPublica)


Mappy links

Looking north at a 1920s land-use map of Scotland’s Ochil Hills in a new 3-D viewer. (National Library of Scotland)

Curb, your enthusiasm: The hottest piece of location data in cities is where the sidewalk meets the street. (CityLab) ♦ Expanding the ride-hailing map: Uber is hustling to map the Middle East ahead of its IPO. (Reuters) ♦ Opposite of progress: Comparing the breadth of urban transit systems, today and yesterday. (Guardian) ♦ Extremely hot map porn: A trove of old maps from Scotland’s National Library can now be explored in a 3-D digital viewer. (National Library of Scotland)


MapLab: locating the future in maps. Sign up your friends and family.

Cheers,

Laura Bliss

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. Life

    Suburban Jobs Are Growing Fastest, But Urban Jobs Pay More

    New labor data show that the suburbs have the fastest job growth in the U.S. But we shouldn’t assume the future of employment will be suburban.

  2. photo: a commuter looks at a small map of the London Tube in 2009
    Maps

    Help! The London Tube Map Is Out of Control.

    It’s never been easy to design a map of the city’s underground transit network. But soon, critics say, legibility concerns will demand a new look.

  3. A sign outside a storefront in Buffalo, New York.
    Environment

    Will Buffalo Become a Climate Change Haven?

    The Western New York city possesses a distinct mix of weather, geography, and infrastructure that could make it a potential climate haven. But for whom?

  4. photo: A vacant home in Oakland that is about to demolished for an apartment complex.
    Equity

    Fix California’s Housing Crisis, Activists Say. But Which One?

    As a controversy over vacancy in the Bay Area and Los Angeles reveals, advocates disagree about what kind of housing should be built, and where.

  5. photo: a woman on an electric scooter
    Transportation

    Most Electric Scooter Riders Are Men. Here's Why.

    Most users of micromobility devices like dockless scooters and e-bikes are young men. Fixing that gender gap may take more than just adding safety features.

×