Also: How advertising conquered urban space, and AOC and Bernie Sanders have a plan to decarbonize U.S. public housing.
What We’re Following
Distress signals: City and state governments spend about $50 billion per year to lure companies with incentives—mostly tax breaks—to come to their town and provide jobs. It’s a policy challenge that economist Tim Bartik, the author of a new book, Making Sense of Incentives, has made a career of rethinking.
The cost of attracting big corporate firms at the expense of city tax rolls came into focus with the city-versus-city competition for Amazon’s second headquarters, the results of which were announced one year ago yesterday. In a two-part conversation with Richard Florida, Bartik reflects on incentives in the aftermath of HQ2, and argues that place-based policies like schools, infrastructure, and services are more effective tools for creating jobs, investing in distressed communities, and addressing regional inequality.
More on CityLab
What We’re Reading
Why thousands of Amazon packages converge on a tiny Montana town (The Verge)
Rod Stewart reveals his epic railway city (BBC News)
Pacific Plaza Park is a victory for downtown Dallas (The Dallas Morning News)
The generational split over the Hong Kong protests has neighbors divided (California Sunday)
D.C. is rapidly gentrifying and the fate of its affordable housing hangs in the balance (Washington City Paper)