Flickr/johnnybelmont

MTA officials are testing out the theory that removing garbage bins from subway platforms will lead to less garbage in the system

It's great that New York City is trying out novel approaches to making its notoriously filthy and smelly subway system a little less, well, filthy and smelly. Experimentation is a crucial component to problem solving, after all, and far too few transit agencies are willing to take risks to find out what works. But this is perhaps the silliest idea I've ever run across as a way to reduce the accumulation of garbage. Via The New York Times:

... trash-weary officials at the Metropolitan Transportation Authority are trying something new: in a counterintuitive plan, a pair of subway stops, one in Queens and one in Greenwich Village, have been entirely bin-free for the last two weeks.

 The idea is to reduce the load on the authority’s overtaxed garbage crew, which is struggling to complete its daily rounds of clearing out 40 tons of trash from the system.

But it also offers a novel experiment: will New Yorkers stop throwing things away in the subway if there is no place to put them?

A couple of things here: First, not giving subway passengers a place to throw away their garbage won't result in less garbage. The garbage will just end up someplace else, whether it's in city-owned trash bins on the street near subway exits, or just strewn all over the platform or inside train cars. The former may very well accomplish what MTA is after here, pushing the burden of collection on the city's Department of Sanitation, but the latter seems certain to lead to an even more overburdened MTA garbage staff.

Second, there's a perfectly logical way to reduce the actual amount of garbage subway passengers produce, a policy which would also have the added benefit of reducing bad odors, vermin and insects: Ban food and drink on the entire system. San Francisco and Washington, D.C. already do this, and their transit systems, while far from pristine, are a lot cleaner for it. Former MTA Chief Jay Walder flatly rejected a food and drink ban earlier this year, even after a food fight broke out on a Brooklyn train. At the time, Walder said he wasn't convinced such a ban would be enforceable, but perhaps his newly named successor, Joseph Lhota, will have a different view. Here in D.C., enforcement isn't only left to WMATA personnel: I've seen passengers successfully shame those who flout the law, thanks in part to the transit agency's thoughtful and amusing public awareness campaigns comparing the Metrorail system's cleanliness to, you guessed it, New York's.

Image courtesy Flickr user johnnybelmont

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. Construction workers build affordable housing units.
    Equity

    Why Is 'Affordable' Housing So Expensive to Build?

    As costs keep rising, it’s becoming harder and harder for governments to subsidize projects like they’ve done in the past.

  2. Maps

    Mapping Where Europe's Population Is Moving, Aging, and Finding Work

    Younger people are fleeing rural areas, migrating northward, and having fewer children. Here’s how that’s changing the region.

  3. Equity

    The Side Pittsburgh Doesn't Want You to See

    Pittsburgh filmmaker Chris Ivey has spent over twelve years documenting the lives of the people displaced so that the city can achieve its “cool” status.  

  4. Equity

    Seattle Has 5 Big Pieces of Advice for Amazon’s HQ2 Winner

    Being HQ1 has been no picnic.

  5. Transportation

    If You Drive Less Than 10,000 Miles a Year, You Probably Shouldn't Own a Car

    Up to one-quarter of all U.S. drivers might be better off using ride-sharing services instead.