Simon Laroche / Flickr

Some will, some won't—it shouldn't change how cities adjust their transportation policies.

The ongoing discussion about Millennial car interest has been treated, rather strangely, as a zero sum game—as if anyone either always drives or never drives, with no behavior in between. So we get a somewhat unnecessary mea culpa from The Atlantic's Derek Thompson, whose fine past reporting has revealed key shifts in how young people feel about driving, upon discovering that some of them are actually buying cars. Citing data from J.D. Power, Thompson shows us that vehicle sales among Gen Y (here, meaning Millennials) have eclipsed those of Gen X:

Derek Thompson via JD Power

The appropriate rebuttal from Joe Cortright at City Observatory is that of course Millennials buy a lot of cars—there's a lot of Millennials. Using Census data and previous J.D. Power measures, Cortright determines that once you account for generation size, Millennials "are buying new cars at a rate far lower than older generations." By his math, Gen Y buys 47.5 cars per 1,000 people, whereas Gen X buys 73.7 per 1,000, and Boomers buy 63.5 per 1,000.

City Observatory

An aside for the record: with the Census data Cortright appears to use, we get the same total number of Millennials (roughly 78 million) but more Gen X (roughly 49 million) and fewer Boomers (about 76 million). So the Gen Y rate of 47.5 per 1,000 remains the same, but Gen X slides to 67 per 1,000 and Boomers hop to 67.2 per 1,000.

Cortright doesn't give Thompson quite enough credit for nuance, but he's right to question the poorly defined J.D. Power figures. Their chosen birth-range of Millennials, from 1977 to 1994, is a clear red flag. Anyone who knows two people near either edge of that range—which includes both 38-year-olds and 21-year-olds—also knows that often the only label they share is "earthling." Any unifying behavioral conclusions drawn from such a diverse group should be taken with extreme caution.

Cortright is also sharp to point out that a better comparison would weigh the car-buying behavior of young people today with that of Gen Xers or Boomers when they were the same age:

Because automobile purchasing patterns vary over a person’s life cycle, you can’t accurately gauge the generational change in buying habits by comparing the current year buying habits of Millennials (average age, late 20s) with GenX (average age early 40s). The more interesting question to answer would be whether the average 25-year-old Millennial today is more or less likely to purchase a vehicle today than someone who was 25 in 2005, or in 1995 or in 1985.

That's data we'd love to see, too. Fortunately we have a decent proxy for it in the form of a recent Census tool that reveals car commute shares by young people in 1980, 1990, 2000, and 2010. But no single or simple conclusion about Millennial driving behavior emerges from this data, either. In some big transit-rich cities (such as New York and Portland, Oregon), young adults are driving to work less today than they did three decades ago. In more car-reliant or transit-deprived places (such as St. Louis or San Diego), the opposite is true.

CityLab
CityLab

So just as it's a little foolish to lump everyone born from 1977 to 1994 into the same category, it's equally unwise to think young people in vastly different environments will approach their daily travels the same way. There is a broad (if obvious) conclusion to reach here: people in dense cities with balanced mobility networks are all less apt to drive. As Emily Badger points out at Wonkblog, perhaps "Millennial" has just become a synonym for "city dweller" in the popular consciousness, even though the trend toward dense city living among young adults appears to be mainly among those with college degrees.

There is one other clear theme in American driving that cuts across all ages, which both Thompson and Cortright do note: per-capita vehicle mileage is down just about everywhere. By one recent analysis, not a single age group drove more in 2009 than it had in 2001. That broad trend away from previous driving habits, rather than the behavior of any ill-defined group, should serve as a loud enough alarm for cities to reconsider their car-first transportation practices.

Because the real question isn't whether or not Millennials will drive—answer: most will, some more than others depending on the place—it's how cities that endure the enormous social costs of driving can help everyone rely less on cars than they did in the past, old and young alike.

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. A rendering of Quayside, the waterfront development now being planned for Toronto.
    Solutions

    A Big Master Plan for Google's Growing Smart City

    Google sibling company Sidewalk Labs has revealed its master plan for the controversial Quayside waterfront development—and it’s a lot bigger.

  2. a photo of commuters on Oakland's Bay Bridge.
    Transportation

    Can Waze Convince Commuters to Carpool Again?

    Google’s wayfinding company wants to help drivers and riders find each other on its navigation app—and ease traffic congestion along the way.

  3. Life

    McDonald's Restaurants Are America's Ultimate 'Third Places'

    Americans have fewer and fewer spaces to gather. That’s where nuggets come in.

  4. a photo of a highway
    Transportation

    Americans Are Spending Billions on Bad Highway Expansions

    PIRG’s annual list of “highway boondoggles” includes nine transportation projects that will cost a total of $25 billion while driving up emissions.

  5. Anthony Bourdain in 2001, when he was still the chef-owner of Les Halles in New York City.
    Life

    Urbanists Could Learn a Lot From Anthony Bourdain

    The work of the acclaimed chef and writer, who has died at 61, provides a model for a truly inclusive urbanism based on the creativity of all human beings.

×