Cyclists ride their bicycles during "No Car Day" in Bogota, February 5, 2015. Jose Gomez / Reuters

Bike lanes aren’t enough, according to a new Fort Collins commuting study.

We’ve known for years that cycling, for all its health benefits, has a dark side: Bikers inhale more black carbon than pedestrians do. Some studies have suggested that cyclists can reduce their exposure to air pollution by taking alternative routes. But a recent study of commuting in Fort Collins complicates that recommendation.

Researchers at Colorado State University followed 45 bicycle and car commuters in Fort Collins and measured their exposure to multiple hazardous air pollutants: black carbon, carbon monoxide, and particulate matter. Compared to drivers, cyclists tended to have higher mean exposure to particulate matter but lower mean exposure to carbon monoxide. They were also able to reduce their mean exposure to black carbon and carbon monoxide by using alternate routes (pictured in the figure below).

Map of Fort Collins showing the direct (black) and alternative (blue) routes taken by the study participants. (Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology)

However, an important distinction emerged between mean exposure and cumulative exposure, which takes the duration of the commute into account:

Longer commute times, regardless of route type, tend to increase cumulative exposures; this difference was especially evident for cycling. Even though cyclists’ mean particulate exposures were reduced on alternative routes, the longer duration of these routes increased cyclist’s cumulative exposures relative to driving.

In other words, simply avoiding routes with high vehicle traffic wasn’t enough to eliminate cyclists’ exposure to air pollution. Since these alternate routes took longer to bike, the increase in cumulative exposure offset some of the reduction in mean exposure. Bikers also breathe heavier and faster than other commuters, which “probably results in at least a doubling of their estimated inhaled exposure relative to driving,” according to the authors.

Even so, you shouldn’t ditch the bike. “The benefit of increased exercise is likely to outweigh the risks because of increased air pollution intake,” the authors write. But their findings do reveal an “important uncertainty” in the net health impacts of cycling versus driving—one that planners should consider at the infrastructural level.

Although Fort Collins is an exceedingly bike-friendly city, its cycling infrastructure consists mostly of on-road bike lanes—meaning cyclists are still exposed to a lot of car traffic even when they take alternative routes instead of main roads. The researchers suggest that cities could achieve larger reductions in pollution exposure by building greater separation between cyclists and drivers—for example, with off-road, multi-use bike paths. Far from negating the benefits of cycling, the Fort Collins study argues that more—and smarter—cycling infrastructure is needed.

H/t Medical Xpress

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. Transportation

    You Can’t Design Bike-Friendly Cities Without Considering Race and Class

    Bike equity is a powerful tool for reducing inequality. Too often, cycling infrastructure is tailored only to wealthy white cyclists.

  2. Amazon HQ2

    Without Amazon HQ2, What Happens to Housing in Queens?

    The arrival of the tech company’s new headquarters was set to shake up the borough’s real estate market, driving up rents and spurring displacement. Now what?

  3. Transportation

    With Trains Like Schwebebahn, No Wonder Germans Love Public Transit

    Infrastructure like this makes it clear why Germany continues to produce enthusiasm for public transit, generation after generation.

  4. Amazon HQ2

    New York’s Ejection of Amazon Is the Start of a Movement

    NYC lawmakers who led a resistance campaign against HQ2 are declaring victory. And already, they have plans to escalate their opposition to tax incentives.

  5. a photo of high-speed rail tracks under construction in Fresno, California.
    Transportation

    Think of California High-Speed Rail as an $11 Billion Streetcar

    California Governor Gavin Newsom’s plan to complete only a Central Valley segment of the rail link risks turning the transportation project into an economic development tool.