Ingolf / Flickr

Berlin has suffered a surge in scofflaw riders, but super strict enforcement also adds to overhead costs.

Berlin transit bosses must be wincing this week.

According to figures that hit the media on Wednesday, the city’s buses, trams, and subways saw an incredible rise in fare evasion last year. In 2013, Berlin caught 228,727 people riding without a ticket. In 2014, that number shot up to 355,476.

To be fair to the city’s transit authority, it has a pretty cast-iron excuse for the rise: the company looking after inspections in 2013 underperformed drastically, and the city has since installed a far stricter replacement that is simply better at finding offenders. The figures are still a rude awakening, and have provoked some debate as to exactly how the city should enforce ticket-buying.

The problem with fare-dodging in Berlin is that it’s just so easy. Like all German cities, Berlin transit uses an honesty system backed up by inspections, meaning there are no ticket barriers to jump over at station entrances. On the platform itself, there are hardly ever any staff—reasonably so, given that standing ticketless on a station platform is in itself no offense. Ticket machines, meanwhile, print out fares with such excruciating slowness that you sometimes feel as if they’re silently daring you to skip the line and jump on a train.

Certainly, once you’re on board, you’re at risk of surprise inspections: the doors close and suddenly guards appear from nowhere flipping their ID wallets open and checking you’ve paid. Even if you’re caught without a ticket, you still have a (risky) outside chance of running away at the next station before they get your details and hand out a €60 fine—a notice many choose to ignore. It’s only if you get caught three times in a row within two years that you face court action.

Compare this to London, where the deterrence system is far tighter. In the U.K. capital, riding public transit without a ticket can incur a fine of up to £1,000 ($1,494) and a criminal record, which of course requires a court trial. Few cases escalate to this level, but the British media is littered with stories of the terrible fallout and shame that can ensue if you’re caught. The other major deterrent is the ubiquitous ticket barriers (albeit sometimes left open, and low enough to vault over) that make fare evasion more difficult.

But which system is better at reducing the cost of fare evasion? It’s not easy to say.

Berlin may have high levels of evasion—some 3 to 5 percent of all journeys, according to Tagesspiegel—but its honesty system also cuts overhead costs. Without the need for barriers, many Berlin subway stations need only a skeleton staff, and offer tickets either through machines or through kiosks whose costs are covered by selling chocolate and magazines. Inspections cost money, of course, but rotating inspections staff around the system allows them to be spread quite thinly.

Meanwhile London’s TfL doesn’t publish similar figures to Berlin’s, although a 2009 survey found that 6 percent of respondents had evaded a fare in the past five years. Without a record of how often they did so, it’s impossible to gauge how much money is being lost. Estimates released in Berlin last year, however, found a similar level of evasion—6 percent of passengers—suggesting that ticket barriers alone aren’t enough.

And Berlin is cracking down a lot harder. In 2013, only 480 people were prosecuted for fare evasion. In 2014, it was 33,723. This huge rise in prosecutions is nonetheless meeting resistance from the courts and prison systems, which are complaining of being clogged. Berlin’s Plötzensee Prison currently has 68 inmates behind bars for fare evasion, there because they’ve chosen prison over paying the fine. Their expensive incarceration (usually a matter of days, not weeks) shows the difficulty of enforcing fare evasion.

Berlin’s relatively tough line on fare evasion may end up encouraging more people to buy tickets. Its savings to society overall, however, may prove harder to demonstrate.

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. A photo-illustration of several big-box retail stores.
    Equity

    After the Retail Apocalypse, Prepare for the Property Tax Meltdown

    Big-box retailers nationwide are slashing their property taxes through a legal loophole known as "dark store theory." For the towns that rely on that revenue, this could be a disaster.

  2. Life

    Inside the Movement to Derail Amazon HQ2 Incentives

    New York and Virginia politicians and activists could still make changes to Amazon HQ2 packages—or at least stop the next bidding war from mirroring this one.

  3. A photo of British Prime Minister Theresa May announcing her government's Brexit deal outside No. 10 Downing Street
    Equity

    Britain Finally Has a Brexit Deal. Everyone Hates It.

    Amid resignations, it's clear the U.K. government massively misjudged how leaving the European Union would play out.

  4. A photo of a small small house in San Francisco's Noe Valley that sold for $1.8 million in 2014.
    Equity

    Why Cities Must Tackle Single-Family Zoning

    As cities wake up to their housing crises, the problems with single-family-home residential zoning will become too egregious to ignore.

  5. A man holding a toddler walks past open-house signs in front of condominiums for sale.
    Life

    Millennials Are More Likely to Buy Their First Homes in Cities

    New research finds that Millennials are 21 percent more likely to buy their first homes near city centers than Generation X.