The Uber app is pictured in front of two London cabs.
Simon Dawson/Reuters

The E.U.’s top court deals a major blow to the ride-hailing company, and other services might get caught in the crossfire.

Uber is a taxi company. That’s the ruling today from the European Court of Justice, the highest court in the European Union, which interprets the union’s laws and ensures their application across all member states.

Uber, of course, has long resisted that label. It presents itself as a digital platform for connecting people, rather than as a taxi service. But a Barcelona taxi association  challenged that claim in court in 2014, frustrated that Uber’s revenues had been partly and unfairly bolstered by worse pay and conditions for drivers. And Wednesday’s resounding judgement against Uber, who sought to appeal the Spanish ruling at the ECJ, is a bombshell. Not only does it mean the company faces far stricter regulation across the E.U., it also undercuts the very way Uber has tried to define itself globally.

The European Court of Justice’s ruling is clear enough, stating that a company whose service is “to connect, by means of a smartphone application and for remuneration, non-professional drivers using their own vehicle with persons who wish to make urban journeys” must be considered “a service in the field of transport.” This doesn’t necessarily mean there will be a change of rules overnight; in fact, it will only directly affect four countries where Uber has yet to be regulated: Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Romania.

In other E.U. states, following a series of legal battles, Uber already operates within national transit laws. In several countries, including all of Scandinavia, it has already cut the low-cost UberPOP service that uses non-professional drivers. Furthermore, the ruling in itself would not necessarily bar Uber from relaunching a service in Barcelona, but merely require it to keep to the same standards as conventional taxi services, thus undercutting any potential professional advantage.

More broadly, there’s a degree of existential threat in the ECJ decision. Uber has largely attempted to sail above the notion that it is a regular company employing actual humans, enabling it to deny such basic employee necessities as sick and holiday pay. Wednesday’s ruling bursts that bubble. Uber’s app-based hailing system may have been the ground-breaking key to its success, but the suggestion that it is not a transportation company is increasingly hard to sustain.

Other similar app-based businesses such as food delivery services, including Grubhub and Deliveroo, may also find themselves under renewed pressure to treat the people who deliver their service as regular employees. In the U.K., Deliveroo recently won the right to give its delivery couriers neither the minimum wage nor sick pay, a judgement now more open to challenge.

The ruling comes at the end of an extremely tough year for Uber. Still reeling structurally and reputationally over sexual harassment claims, the company is currently appealing London’s September decision not to renew its license, a move that will see Uber’s vehicles disappear from the city’s streets if it’s upheld. This process could take years, during which the company could continue to operate, but the company is nonetheless under strong pressure from the British union representing cab drivers, which says Uber’s working conditions are a threat to public safety. While the convenience of its app means that Uber continues to have many European users, the unregulated tide that allowed it to roll out across Europe so fast now seems to be turning, and fast.

About the Author

Most Popular

  1. Graffiti on a wall reads "Tourist Go Home."
    Life

    The Global Tourism Backlash

    A surge in tourism has led to a backlash in cities where residents feel overrun. How can these cities use tourism to their benefit?

  2. Illustration of a house with separate activities taking place in different rooms.
    POV

    The Case for Rooms

    It’s time to end the tyranny of open-concept interior design.

  3. Transportation

    Behold San Francisco's $2 Billion Bus Station

    The Salesforce Transit Center, San Francisco’s new bus and (someday) high-speed rail terminal, has been billed as the Grand Central Station of the West. But it might just become the Bay Area’s answer to the High Line.

  4. Roselyn Grullon, Amaurys Grullon, and Josue Caceres in front of their shop, Bronx Native on Lincoln Avenue. It is one of the new businesses by Bronx locals hoping to take control of the changes in the borough.
    Equity

    The Bronx: Don’t Call It a Comeback

    These Bronx natives have been here for years. In the midst of rapid gentrification, they say they are taking control and offering the borough cultural experiences that as youngsters, they had to venture downtown to find.

  5. Equity

    Ben Carson's New Push Against Fair-Housing Rules Has a NIMBY Twist

    The HUD secretary is targeting the desegregation measure he called “social engineering.”